RPRNA

Search results for: “Google Ad”

  • Apple hires new leader to boost Siri and AI

    Apple hires new leader to boost Siri and AI

    Apple is shaking things up inside its company to make Siri and its AI better, according to Bloomberg. They’ve brought in Kim Vorrath, who has been with Apple for 37 years, to lead the AI team under John Giannandrea, who is in charge of AI at Apple.

    Vorrath has a knack for managing big software projects and keeping everything on track. She’s known as Apple’s “bug fixer” and has been a big influence in the company. Before this new role, she was part of the team working on Apple’s AR/VR headset, the Vision Pro.

    This change comes right after lots of talk about how Siri didn’t do well when asked about Super Bowl scores. For a while now, Siri hasn’t been as good as other voice helpers, especially when compared to new AI chatbots.

    Apple has also been dealing with complaints about how its Apple Intelligence summarizes news, sometimes getting things wrong and confusing people. To tackle this, they’re planning to stop these summaries for news and entertainment apps in the next update, iOS 18.3, which should come out soon.

    Despite trying to make Siri better by adding ChatGPT from OpenAI, there are still issues. But Apple is working on it, with plans for more Siri improvements in the iOS 18.4 update and even bigger changes in iOS 19, where they might make Siri like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini.

    Moving Vorrath to the AI team shows that Apple thinks AI is more crucial than their work on Vision Pro. She’s good at organizing tech teams and making their work better. In a note about the change, Giannandrea mentioned that they want to focus on making Siri work better and improving Apple’s own AI systems.

  • Tim Cook Among Tech Leaders Attending Trump’s Inauguration: What It Means for Apple and the Industry

    Tim Cook Among Tech Leaders Attending Trump’s Inauguration: What It Means for Apple and the Industry

    Apple CEO Tim Cook, along with several other prominent tech leaders, will attend the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump. The move underscores the complex relationship between Silicon Valley and Washington, where politics and business interests often intersect.

    Tech Leaders Gather for a Historic Event

    Bloomberg reports that Cook’s attendance reflects a broader trend of engagement between tech executives and Trump’s administration. In the months leading up to the inauguration, major tech companies and CEOs, including Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Mark Zuckerberg (Meta), and Elon Musk (Tesla), have been interacting more closely with the incoming administration. These efforts often involve donations to inaugural funds or direct meetings with Trump and his team.

    Tim Cook personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, signaling Apple’s intent to maintain dialogue with the new administration. This donation follows Cook’s December visit to Mar-a-Lago, where he had dinner with Trump, as well as a congratulatory message Cook posted on social media after Trump’s election victory.

    The Financial Stakes: Tech’s Investment in Political Influence

    Trump’s inauguration fund has reportedly amassed $200 million, thanks in part to contributions from industry leaders and corporations. Companies such as Google, Amazon, Meta, Uber, Toyota, Ford, and GM have also made significant donations. These investments are widely seen as a way to secure favorable policies or avoid potential regulatory roadblocks under the new administration.

    For Apple, this engagement may be particularly strategic. Trump’s stated intention to impose tariffs on imported goods poses a potential challenge for tech companies. Apple has historically worked to minimize the impact of such policies on its operations.

    Tariffs and Tech: Apple’s Delicate Balancing Act

    During Trump’s first term, Apple successfully avoided tariffs on major products like the iPhone, iPad, and Mac, though some tariffs were imposed on accessories such as the Apple Watch, AirPods, and HomePod. In 2019, Trump acknowledged Cook’s arguments against tariffs, stating that the Apple CEO had “made a good case” about how tariffs could disadvantage Apple compared to competitors.

    By attending the inauguration and fostering a relationship with the administration, Cook may be positioning Apple to negotiate exemptions or influence future trade policies that could impact the tech giant’s supply chain and pricing strategy.

    Broader Implications for Tech-Government Relations

    The presence of high-profile tech leaders at Trump’s inauguration underscores a shifting dynamic in Silicon Valley’s relationship with Washington. While the tech industry has traditionally been perceived as leaning toward liberal politics, the pragmatic need to navigate regulatory and trade issues often necessitates bipartisan engagement.

    As the leader of one of the world’s most influential companies, Cook’s actions reflect a balancing act—maintaining Apple’s values while securing its business interests in a politically polarized environment.

    Closing Thoughts

    Tim Cook’s decision to attend Trump’s inauguration is emblematic of the evolving relationship between technology and politics. As the tech industry grapples with challenges ranging from trade policies to antitrust scrutiny, maintaining open lines of communication with government leaders is more critical than ever.

    Cook’s attendance highlights Apple’s commitment to navigating these complexities while safeguarding its position as a global innovator. For tech leaders and companies alike, this moment serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between business and governance in shaping the future of the industry.

  • Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    The internet landscape is dominated by a few key players, and the relationship between Apple and Google is a fascinating one. Recently, Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of services, made headlines by declaring the company’s continued commitment to Google as the default search engine on its devices. This decision, fueled by a multi-billion dollar deal between the two giants, raises questions about competition, user privacy, and the future of search itself.

    A Symbiotic Partnership: Billions and Brand Loyalty

    The financial incentive for Apple’s stance is undeniable. Google reportedly pays a staggering $20 billion annually to maintain its position as the default search engine on iPhones, iPads, and Macs. This hefty sum translates to a significant revenue stream for Apple, with an additional 36% of ad revenue generated from Safari searches finding its way back to Cupertino. The partnership also fosters brand loyalty for both companies. Google benefits from the massive user base of Apple devices, while Apple leverages Google’s established search technology, ensuring a seamless user experience.

    Beyond the Money: Resources and Innovation

    However, Eddy Cue’s statement goes beyond just financial gain. He argues that developing a new search engine from scratch would be a resource-intensive endeavor, demanding “billions of dollars and many years.” This investment would divert focus away from other areas of Apple’s innovation pipeline, potentially hindering the development of groundbreaking new products and services.

    Furthermore, Cue emphasizes the dynamic nature of search technology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the way searches are conducted and interpreted. Building a competitive search engine would require constant investment in AI research and development, a gamble with an uncertain payoff.

    The Privacy Conundrum: Targeted Ads vs. User Choice

    A key sticking point in the debate concerns user privacy. Apple prides itself on its commitment to data protection. Building a successful search engine often relies on targeted advertising, a practice that raises privacy concerns. Cue acknowledges this, highlighting that Apple currently lacks the infrastructure and expertise necessary to navigate the world of targeted advertising at scale.

    Interestingly, despite Google being the default option, users retain the ability to choose alternative search engines like Yahoo!, Bing, DuckDuckGo, or Ecosia. This element of user control adds another layer to the conversation.

    Regulators Step In: Balancing Competition and Revenue

    The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) intervention in 2023 throws a wrench into the well-oiled machine of the Apple-Google partnership. The DOJ accuses Google of anti-competitive practices, with the search engine deal used as evidence. Regulators have proposed two remedies:

    1. Maintaining Google as the default search engine but stripping Apple of ad revenue: This approach aims to foster competition by creating a disincentive for Apple to favor Google.
    2. Preventing future deals between Apple and Google altogether: This more drastic measure seeks to dismantle the existing partnership and force both companies to compete on a level playing field.

    Cue vehemently disagrees with both options. He argues that Apple should retain the right to choose partnerships that best serve its users. He believes that the DOJ’s remedies would ultimately “hamstring Apple’s ability to continue delivering products that best serve its users’ needs.”

    The Future of Search: A Collaborative Landscape?

    As the battle between regulators and tech giants continues, the future of search takes center stage. Will the partnership between Apple and Google endure, or will a more fragmented landscape emerge? Perhaps the answer lies in fostering collaboration between tech companies and regulators, creating a framework that promotes innovation, user privacy, and healthy competition within the search ecosystem.

    One thing is certain: the current landscape is far from static. The next generation of search experiences may be powered by AI, prioritize privacy, and cater to user needs in ways we can only begin to imagine. As companies like Apple and Google continue to navigate this ever-evolving landscape, the fight for search supremacy promises to be a fascinating one to watch.

  • Apple’s Long Game: iPhones expected to receive extended iOS 19 support

    Apple’s Long Game: iPhones expected to receive extended iOS 19 support

    For years, iPhone users have enjoyed a significant advantage over their Android counterparts: lengthy software support. While the exact duration fluctuates, Apple typically offers updates for at least five years after a device’s release. This commitment translates to continued security patches, bug fixes, and even major feature upgrades for older iPhones.

    The recent buzz surrounding iOS 19 highlights this philosophy once again. A report by iPhoneSoft.fr suggests a wide range of iPhones, encompassing several generations, are rumored to be compatible with the upcoming update. This list includes the recently released iPhone 16 series alongside models dating back to 2018, such as the iPhone XS, XS Max, and XR.

    This extended support window is particularly noteworthy considering the inclusion of older devices. It suggests that iPhones as old as seven years could potentially receive iOS 19, extending their functional lifespan significantly.

    While the experience on such veteran iPhones might not be identical to the latest and greatest models, it still offers a crucial benefit. Users who cherish their older iPhones can continue to enjoy the security and functionality of a major iOS update, potentially delaying the need for an upgrade.

    This extended support stands in stark contrast to the historical landscape of Android software updates. Traditionally, Android users faced a much shorter window, often receiving updates for just 2-3 years. However, the tide seems to be turning. Major players like Google and Samsung are increasingly prioritizing software support, mirroring Apple’s commitment. These companies now offer updates for up to seven years, a remarkable improvement compared to the past.

    While the gap between Android and iOS in terms of total support duration is narrowing, another crucial factor remains: timeliness. One of the historical frustrations with Android updates has been the lag between their release and their availability on individual devices. Months often elapsed before users of specific phones could experience the latest OS.

    This has prompted Google to adjust its release strategy. Android 16, for instance, is expected to launch in mid-2025 instead of the usual Q3/Q4 timeframe. This shift aims to grant manufacturers more time for optimization and integration, potentially leading to faster and more streamlined rollouts for users.

    In conclusion, Apple’s commitment to extended iOS support continues to be a valuable selling point for iPhone users. The prospect of receiving major updates for older models like the iPhone XS series exemplifies this philosophy. While Android is making strides in the realm of software support, the issue of timeliness remains a hurdle to overcome. As Google adjusts its release strategy and manufacturers prioritize optimization, the landscape for Android updates might evolve further, potentially leading to a more user-friendly experience for Android users in the future.

    Source

  • How Samsung Galaxy S25 borrowed from Apple’s playbook

    How Samsung Galaxy S25 borrowed from Apple’s playbook

    Fans of both Apple and Samsung often argue about who copied whom. While Apple has faced legal challenges over design, Samsung has been quite open about taking inspiration from Apple, especially with the launch of the Galaxy S25.

    Smart Features Borrowed

    We all know Apple has been slow with its AI developments. While Samsung’s phones are packed with smart AI tools, Apple’s AI features are just starting to roll out and are pretty basic. Still, Samsung couldn’t help but notice Apple’s AI offerings.

    Apple’s AI system can work with ChatGPT and is planning to integrate with Google Gemini. Samsung followed suit, making its AI system work with external chatbots, starting with Google Gemini instead of its own Bixby.

    When you use Samsung’s Gemini, you see a text box with a bright border, much like Siri. It handles both text and voice inputs, and when you highlight text, it shows options very similar to Apple’s text editing tools, allowing you to check spelling or format as a table.

    Samsung also introduced call recording, transcription, and summarization in its phone app, features already familiar to iPhone users with iOS 18. Galaxy S25 users can now search for photos by describing them, summarize web articles, and even turn photos into drawings, much like Apple’s Image Playground.

    For privacy, Samsung’s AI can work offline, similar to Apple’s approach to limit cloud usage.

    User Interface Echoes

    During the Galaxy S25 reveal, Samsung introduced One UI 7. It features the Now Bar, which shows live updates like sports scores or timers, much like Apple’s Live Activities.

    Samsung’s camera updates mimic some iPhone features from months ago, including the ability to record in log format and tweak audio focus. They’ve also adopted a version of Apple’s Photographic Styles, giving users control over image filters and tones.

    Design Similarities

    The Galaxy S25 Ultra looks strikingly similar to the iPhone 16 Pro with its flat edges and rounded corners, moving away from Samsung’s previous curved designs. The top models now use titanium, while cheaper models stick with aluminum.

    Samsung jumped the gun on Apple’s rumored slim iPhone 17 Air with their Galaxy S25 Edge, choosing style over some features like a third camera. The protective cases for the Galaxy are almost identical to Apple’s transparent MagSafe cases.

    Moreover, Samsung’s upcoming VR headset, Project Moohan, seems inspired by Apple’s Vision Pro, even in its interface design.

    Innovation or Imitation?

    While some might see this as copying, Samsung does bring its own twist to these features. Their version of Photographic Styles, for example, allows for more creative control over image composition. However, in the tech world, where both iOS and Android offer similar functionalities, it’s clear that each company builds upon the other’s ideas to enhance user experience.

    Still, perhaps Samsung could aim for a bit more originality next time around.

  • Siri’s super bowl slip-up: gives eagles 33 fake wins

    Siri’s super bowl slip-up: gives eagles 33 fake wins

    In a recent test, Siri showed it still has trouble with basic facts. One Foot Tsunami’s Paul Kafasis checked how well Siri knew Super Bowl history, and the results were not great. Siri only got it right 34% of the time, correctly naming just 20 winners out of 58 Super Bowls.

    The most surprising mistake was Siri saying the Philadelphia Eagles won 33 Super Bowls. In reality, the Eagles have only won one. Siri’s answers were all over the place, sometimes talking about the wrong Super Bowl or giving unrelated football info.

    Siri did okay for a little while, correctly answering for Super Bowls V to VII, but then it went off track, getting 15 answers wrong in a row from XVII to XXXII. When asked about Super Bowl XVI, Siri even suggested asking ChatGPT, which gave the right answer, showing Siri’s knowledge isn’t up to par.

    This test was done on iOS 18.2.1 with Apple’s new smart tech, and the same problems were seen on the latest iOS beta and macOS. Kafasis put all the results into a spreadsheet you can look at.

    Daring Fireball’s John Gruber also tested Siri with sports questions and found it did worse than other search engines and AI like ChatGPT, Kagi, DuckDuckGo, and Google. Interestingly, the old version of Siri was better at admitting when it didn’t know the answer by showing web links, which at least gave a chance at finding the right answer.

    Gruber was quite critical, saying:

    “New Siri, with Apple’s smart tech and ChatGPT help, gives answers that are completely but believably wrong, which is the worst kind of mistake. It’s also inconsistent in its errors — I asked the same thing four times and got four different wrong answers.”

    Siri’s performance has been criticized before, but these tests show how it can confidently give wrong information. Apple is working on a smarter Siri using advanced language models, hoping to make it as good as other chatbots like ChatGPT. They plan to show off this new Siri in 2025 but won’t release it until spring 2026 with iOS 19.

  • Apple Watch Bands are safe, says Apple, amid lawsuit

    Apple Watch Bands are safe, says Apple, amid lawsuit

    Apple has reassured consumers that its Apple Watch bands are “safe to wear,” following a lawsuit claiming some bands contain harmful “forever chemicals,” known as PFAS.

    Apple’s Statement:

    Apple Watch bands are completely safe for everyone to wear. We conduct our own tests and also involve independent labs to check our materials thoroughly, including those used in our watch bands.

    Apple also mentioned that they go beyond what the law requires to ensure their products and manufacturing processes are free from dangerous chemicals.

    Phasing Out PFAS:

    Despite confirming the safety of current bands, Apple is actively working to eliminate PFAS from all its products. In a statement from November 2022, Apple outlined their plan:

    We began by looking at the most common PFAS used in our products – fluoropolymers. Although our tests show these are safe for users, we’re expanding our efforts to include all manufacturing stages. We aim to eliminate all PFAS, understanding it’s a complex process that needs careful consideration to find effective, safe alternatives.

    This transition will take time as we catalog PFAS use, develop new materials that perform just as well, and ensure these alternatives are not harmful themselves.

    The Lawsuit:

    The lawsuit references a study which found high levels of PFAS in some smartwatch bands, suggesting these chemicals could be absorbed through the skin leading to health issues. This study included brands like Apple, Nike, Fitbit, and Google, though it didn’t name specific bands.

    When asked about which specific Apple Watch bands might contain PFAS, Apple did not provide an immediate response. The lawsuit aims to include anyone in the U.S. who bought a Sport Band, Nike Sport Band, or Ocean Band for an Apple Watch.

    The case awaits a judicial decision on whether it can proceed as a class action.

  • Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Macworld argues that Samsung’s latest Galaxy S25 has taken inspiration from over a dozen iPhone features. From the phone’s sleek, straight-edged design to how its AI assistant displays, Samsung seems to have borrowed quite a bit from Apple.

    Macworld’s Mahmoud Itani highlights this, starting with the AI features. The Galaxy S25 has integrated AI similar to Apple’s, allowing users to connect with third-party chatbots like Google Gemini, just as Apple does with ChatGPT in its system. When activating Gemini on the Galaxy S25, users see a text box with a colorful, glowing border, which looks a lot like Siri’s interface on iPhones. Additionally, the text selection tool in Samsung’s phone mimics Apple’s Writing Tools, offering options to proofread or transform text into tables.

    Itani goes on to mention other features like the ability to record and summarize calls, perform natural language searches in the photo gallery, and a photo editing tool that resembles Apple’s Image Playground. There’s also a new feature similar to Apple’s Live Activities, called the Now Bar, and enhanced audio features for video recording akin to Apple’s cinematic audio.

    9to5Mac’s Viewpoint
    It’s clear that Samsung often looks to Apple for inspiration. Their strategy seems to involve quickly bringing to market features similar to those rumored or leaked for upcoming iPhones, aiming to beat Apple to the punch. However, Apple isn’t innocent of copying either, as both companies tend to adopt similar technologies once they’re mainstream.

    Ultimately, this mutual borrowing is beneficial. The competitive pressure drives each company to innovate and perfect their offerings, leading to better products for consumers.

  • Apple Watch Bands might have harmful chemicals, lawsuit claims

    Apple Watch Bands might have harmful chemicals, lawsuit claims

    A lawsuit filed in a California court this week targets Apple, alleging that the company did not tell customers about dangerous chemicals in some of their Apple Watch bands.

    The lawsuit suggests that Apple promotes the watch as good for health and fitness, but fails to mention that certain bands might be harmful. According to the legal document, a study recently found high levels of substances called “forever chemicals” or PFAS in some smartwatch bands. These chemicals can soak into the skin and might cause health issues over time.

    PFAS are used in synthetic rubber to prevent the bands from getting dirty or discolored by sweat or grime.

    Although the study didn’t name specific brands, it tested bands from companies like Apple, Nike, Fitbit, and Google. The lawsuit points out that among these, some expensive bands, including those from Apple, had significant amounts of PFAS. The lawsuit is aimed at anyone in the U.S. who bought a Sport Band, Nike Sport Band, or Ocean Band for their Apple Watch.

    Apple has not yet commented on these allegations. A judge will decide if this lawsuit can move forward.

    This situation highlights the importance of transparency in product materials, especially when items are marketed for health and daily use. Consumers deserve to know what they’re wearing, particularly when it’s something as close to the body as a smartwatch band.

  • Trump criticizes EU over fines on Apple and other US tech companies

    Trump criticizes EU over fines on Apple and other US tech companies

    Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump has voiced strong disapproval of the European Union (EU) for imposing hefty fines on American tech giants like Apple, Google, and Facebook.

    US President Labels EU Actions as “Taxation”

    Speaking virtually at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump accused the EU of unfairly targeting major US companies. He described the fines as a “form of taxation” against American businesses, expressing frustration with the EU’s regulatory measures.

    Trump stated, “They’ve taken $15 or $16 billion from Apple, billions from Google, and now they’re after Facebook for even more. These are American companies, and what the EU is doing is wrong. In my view, it’s just another way of taxing them. We have serious complaints about the EU.”

    The Apple case Trump referred to centers around a lengthy legal dispute over taxes in Ireland. The EU ruled that Apple’s tax arrangement with Ireland violated its laws, forcing the tech giant to pay significant back taxes.

    Trump’s Broader Criticism of the EU

    Beyond tech companies, Trump criticized the EU’s broader economic policies, highlighting trade imbalances. He remarked, “The EU treats the US very unfairly. We’re dealing with hundreds of billions in trade deficits with them. No one is happy about it, and we’re going to take action.”

    Reactions and Implications

    Critics, however, were quick to point out Trump’s inconsistent stance. While he condemned the EU for regulating American firms, his own policies often focused on tariffs and trade measures against foreign businesses.

    These remarks signal potential challenges ahead for US tech companies operating in Europe. As the EU continues to scrutinize firms like Apple, Google, and Facebook, the friction between American leadership and European regulators could intensify.

    Trump’s statements also raise questions about how his administration might approach issues like App Store regulations and other matters affecting US tech firms in global markets.

More posts