RPRNA

Search results for: “Zen”

  • Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Macworld argues that Samsung’s latest Galaxy S25 has taken inspiration from over a dozen iPhone features. From the phone’s sleek, straight-edged design to how its AI assistant displays, Samsung seems to have borrowed quite a bit from Apple.

    Macworld’s Mahmoud Itani highlights this, starting with the AI features. The Galaxy S25 has integrated AI similar to Apple’s, allowing users to connect with third-party chatbots like Google Gemini, just as Apple does with ChatGPT in its system. When activating Gemini on the Galaxy S25, users see a text box with a colorful, glowing border, which looks a lot like Siri’s interface on iPhones. Additionally, the text selection tool in Samsung’s phone mimics Apple’s Writing Tools, offering options to proofread or transform text into tables.

    Itani goes on to mention other features like the ability to record and summarize calls, perform natural language searches in the photo gallery, and a photo editing tool that resembles Apple’s Image Playground. There’s also a new feature similar to Apple’s Live Activities, called the Now Bar, and enhanced audio features for video recording akin to Apple’s cinematic audio.

    9to5Mac’s Viewpoint
    It’s clear that Samsung often looks to Apple for inspiration. Their strategy seems to involve quickly bringing to market features similar to those rumored or leaked for upcoming iPhones, aiming to beat Apple to the punch. However, Apple isn’t innocent of copying either, as both companies tend to adopt similar technologies once they’re mainstream.

    Ultimately, this mutual borrowing is beneficial. The competitive pressure drives each company to innovate and perfect their offerings, leading to better products for consumers.

  • Hidden court case on iCloud security sparks calls for openness

    Hidden court case on iCloud security sparks calls for openness

    A private court session about iCloud encryption started on Friday, and people in the UK and US are pushing for it to be made public. The UK government wants Apple to add a secret way into iCloud, not just for UK citizens but for everyone using it worldwide. Some iCloud info uses basic protection where Apple keeps a key and can share it with governments if ordered. Other data uses stronger protection, where only the user and their devices have the key.

    Apple offers a privacy tool called Advanced Data Protection (ADP), which locks nearly all iCloud data so tightly that even Apple can’t open it. If ADP is on, Apple can’t hand over data to governments. The UK’s demand would force Apple to unlock ADP. Instead of agreeing, Apple stopped offering ADP to UK users while it fights the rule.

    The Quiet Court Battle Over a Hidden Demand

    The UK law makes these orders secret, and any challenges to them happen behind closed doors. Apple found a smart workaround to hint at the issue. It couldn’t legally say the UK told it to unlock ADP, so it simply pulled ADP from the UK without saying why. The message was obvious: “We can’t admit the UK demanded this, or that we said no.”

    Apple also couldn’t say it was fighting the order, but somehow that news slipped out too. UK reporters showed up at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday but couldn’t enter the courtroom.

    Protests in the UK and US

    Many groups are upset. UK news outlets like the BBC, Reuters, and The Guardian, along with privacy groups like Big Brother Watch, have complained to the court, saying the case should be public. Privacy International and Liberty also teamed up to argue against the secret order.

    “This secret move by the UK to weaken security for everyone is unfair and too extreme,” said Caroline Wilson Palow from Privacy International. “People everywhere need strong protection to stay safe from threats.” In the US, five lawmakers from both parties, including Senator Ron Wyden and Representative Andy Biggs, demanded the court open up the case. They say hiding it makes no sense now that the order is widely known, especially since Apple already pulled ADP from the UK last month.

  • The TikTok Saga: Apple’s compliance and the shifting sands of digital sovereignty

    The TikTok Saga: Apple’s compliance and the shifting sands of digital sovereignty

    The digital landscape shifted dramatically this past weekend as Apple, in a move echoing the complexities of international relations and technological control, removed TikTok and other ByteDance-owned applications from its U.S. App Store. This action, far from being a simple business decision, is a direct consequence of escalating legislative measures aimed at addressing perceived national security concerns surrounding foreign-owned digital platforms. 

    The backdrop to this removal is the recently enacted “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” a piece of legislation that mandates the divestiture of ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok within the United States. Failure to comply, the law stipulates, would result in a complete ban of the platform within the country. With the deadline for compliance having arrived, companies like Apple and Google were left with little choice but to enforce the law, facing substantial penalties for non-compliance.

    Apple, in a publicly released statement, emphasized its commitment to adhering to the legal frameworks of the regions in which it operates. This statement underscores the delicate balance tech giants must maintain between global reach and local regulations. The removal of TikTok, along with other ByteDance applications such as CapCut and Hypic, was presented not as a matter of choice, but as a legal obligation. 

    The official statement from Apple clarifies the scope of the action: “Pursuant to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, apps developed by ByteDance Ltd. and its subsidiaries — including TikTok, CapCut, Lemon8, and others — will no longer be available for download or updates on the App Store for users in the United States starting January 19, 2025.” This statement serves as a clear confirmation of the legal impetus behind the removal. 

    The ramifications of this decision extend beyond mere app availability. Apple’s statement also addressed the implications for international visitors to the U.S. who may experience restricted functionality of ByteDance applications due to the newly implemented law. This detail highlights the far-reaching impact of the legislation, affecting not only U.S. citizens but also those traveling within the country. 

    For existing TikTok users in the United States, the impact was immediate. As of late Saturday, access to the app was effectively cut off, with TikTok itself acknowledging the “temporary unavailability” of the service within the U.S. While the app remains accessible and fully functional in other regions of the world, American users find themselves abruptly disconnected from the platform.  

    The timing of this event adds another layer of complexity to the situation. With the upcoming presidential inauguration scheduled for Monday, January 20th, rumors are circulating about a potential 90-day reprieve for TikTok.

    Whether this reprieve will materialize remains to be seen, and the long-term future of TikTok’s operation within the U.S. under ByteDance ownership hangs in the balance. The possibility of requiring a change in ownership to comply with U.S. regulations is a significant point of discussion, adding uncertainty to the platform’s future in the American market. 

    This situation is more than just a dispute over a social media app. It represents a broader conversation about digital sovereignty, national security, and the influence of foreign technology within domestic markets. The actions taken by the U.S. government and the subsequent compliance by companies like Apple set a precedent that could have significant implications for the future of global digital interactions.

    It raises important questions about the balance between national security concerns, free access to information, and the role of technology companies in navigating these complex issues. The TikTok saga is far from over, and its unfolding will undoubtedly continue to shape the discourse around technology, politics, and international relations.

  • How a beachcomber and an iPhone’s Medical ID reunited a lost device with its owner

    How a beachcomber and an iPhone’s Medical ID reunited a lost device with its owner

    The ocean holds many secrets, and sometimes, it returns unexpected treasures. Recently, a heartwarming story emerged from the shores of Brazil, highlighting the unexpected utility of Apple’s Medical ID feature. Thiago Itagaki was enjoying a swim at Maresias beach when he stumbled upon a submerged iPhone. The device lay three meters deep and about ten meters from the shoreline. After inquiring among beachgoers without success, Thiago took the phone home, determined to find its owner.

    The iPhone was completely drained of power and encased in a cover holding three credit cards. Thiago carefully dried the device and, after charging it, discovered the Medical ID feature. This often-overlooked function allows users to store crucial information, accessible even without unlocking the phone, for emergencies. This data includes allergies, blood type, and, crucially for this story, emergency contacts. Thiago contacted the number listed under “Love,” successfully reaching the iPhone’s owner.

    The owner, a resident of São Paulo, had lost the phone during New Year’s Eve celebrations. Unbelievably, the device had spent four days underwater. The owner, who had long given up hope of recovery, was overjoyed. The story quickly gained traction online, demonstrating how technology can unexpectedly bridge the gap between strangers and reunite lost possessions. This incident serves as a potent reminder of the importance of keeping one’s Medical ID updated, a simple step that can have profound consequences. While iPhones boast water resistance, this incident highlights the feature’s limitations and the importance of backup plans.

    The Chip Battle: AMD’s Claims and the Missing Piece of the Puzzle

    The tech world is constantly abuzz with competition, particularly in the realm of processors. Recently, AMD unveiled its new Ryzen AI Max laptop chip, making bold claims about its performance relative to Apple’s M4 series. However, a closer look reveals a significant omission in their comparative data.  

    AMD’s Ryzen AI Max, a 16-core chip designed for AI and graphics-intensive tasks, is positioned as a powerhouse for creators and gamers. To demonstrate its capabilities, AMD presented benchmark comparisons against Apple’s M4 chips, commonly found in MacBook Pros. The comparisons included the 12-core M4 and the 14-core M4 Pro, showcasing the Ryzen AI Max’s advantages in various rendering workloads. In some benchmarks, the Ryzen showed significant leads, bolstering AMD’s claims of superior performance.  

    However, a critical detail was missing: the 16-core M4 Max. This omission raises serious questions about the validity of AMD’s comparisons. The M4 Max, with its significantly more powerful GPU (up to 40 cores compared to the M4 Pro’s 20), represents the top tier of Apple’s silicon. By excluding this crucial chip from the benchmarks, AMD painted an incomplete picture. While the Ryzen AI Max might outperform the lower-tier M4 chips in certain tasks, its performance against the M4 Max remains unknown.

    This selective comparison raises suspicion that the M4 Max would outperform the Ryzen AI Max in relevant benchmarks, particularly those heavily reliant on GPU performance. By focusing on less powerful configurations, AMD avoids a direct comparison that could potentially undermine their marketing narrative.

    The presentation highlighted the Ryzen AI Max “winning easily against the 12-core [M4] and trading blows with the 14-core [M4 Pro],” conveniently sidestepping the elephant in the room. This strategic omission suggests a deliberate attempt to present the Ryzen AI Max in the best possible light, without providing a complete and fair comparison against Apple’s full range of silicon.

    The tech community has already picked up on this discrepancy. Online discussions and comments sections are filled with users pointing out the missing comparison, suggesting that AMD is trying to maintain relevance in a market where Apple has made significant strides with its silicon. This highlights the importance of critical analysis when evaluating performance claims and the need for comprehensive data to draw accurate conclusions.

    Source/Via

More posts