Search results for: “call”

  • Apple might launch a cheaper Vision headset called Vision Air this year

    Apple might launch a cheaper Vision headset called Vision Air this year

    Apple is working on a new mixed-reality headset that could be released by the end of this year, according to a report from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. The new device might be called the “Vision Air” and would be a more affordable option compared to the current Vision Pro headset.

    Kuo says the Vision Air is expected to be lighter, have fewer features, and cost less than the Vision Pro, which starts at $3,499. While the Vision Air might drop some high-end specs to lower the price, it will still offer a strong mixed-reality experience. Apple’s goal seems to be making spatial computing more available to a larger number of people.

    The final pricing is not confirmed yet, but earlier reports suggest Apple is aiming for something between $1,500 and $2,500. Mass production could start in the second half of 2025, but Apple might announce it earlier to build excitement.

    Apple is also working on a second-generation Vision Pro with better performance, but that model is likely to stay expensive. For now, the Vision Air could become a key product for Apple if it manages to offer a balance of performance and affordability.

    Kuo also mentioned that some changes are happening in Apple’s Vision headset team, including leadership adjustments to improve the product line.

  • Hidden court case on iCloud security sparks calls for openness

    Hidden court case on iCloud security sparks calls for openness

    A private court session about iCloud encryption started on Friday, and people in the UK and US are pushing for it to be made public. The UK government wants Apple to add a secret way into iCloud, not just for UK citizens but for everyone using it worldwide. Some iCloud info uses basic protection where Apple keeps a key and can share it with governments if ordered. Other data uses stronger protection, where only the user and their devices have the key.

    Apple offers a privacy tool called Advanced Data Protection (ADP), which locks nearly all iCloud data so tightly that even Apple can’t open it. If ADP is on, Apple can’t hand over data to governments. The UK’s demand would force Apple to unlock ADP. Instead of agreeing, Apple stopped offering ADP to UK users while it fights the rule.

    The Quiet Court Battle Over a Hidden Demand

    The UK law makes these orders secret, and any challenges to them happen behind closed doors. Apple found a smart workaround to hint at the issue. It couldn’t legally say the UK told it to unlock ADP, so it simply pulled ADP from the UK without saying why. The message was obvious: “We can’t admit the UK demanded this, or that we said no.”

    Apple also couldn’t say it was fighting the order, but somehow that news slipped out too. UK reporters showed up at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday but couldn’t enter the courtroom.

    Protests in the UK and US

    Many groups are upset. UK news outlets like the BBC, Reuters, and The Guardian, along with privacy groups like Big Brother Watch, have complained to the court, saying the case should be public. Privacy International and Liberty also teamed up to argue against the secret order.

    “This secret move by the UK to weaken security for everyone is unfair and too extreme,” said Caroline Wilson Palow from Privacy International. “People everywhere need strong protection to stay safe from threats.” In the US, five lawmakers from both parties, including Senator Ron Wyden and Representative Andy Biggs, demanded the court open up the case. They say hiding it makes no sense now that the order is widely known, especially since Apple already pulled ADP from the UK last month.

  • Apple might call new iPhone ‘iPhone 16E’ not ‘iPhone SE 4’

    Apple might call new iPhone ‘iPhone 16E’ not ‘iPhone SE 4’

    Apple is rumored to unveil a new budget-friendly iPhone tomorrow, and hints are strong that it could be named iPhone 16E rather than iPhone SE 4. Initially, many speculated this new model would be another iPhone SE, following the previous generations. However, recent leaks suggest otherwise, leaning towards the name iPhone 16E.

    The name iPhone 16E first popped up in December, mentioned by Fixed Focus Digital on Weibo, a popular social media site in China. Not long after, a leaker named Majin Bu on X (formerly Twitter) echoed these sentiments, suggesting the next iPhone SE might be dubbed iPhone 16E.

    Just today, Majin Bu shared another clue, stating they’ve seen a box labeled “iPhone 16E”. Adding fuel to this rumor, Bloomberg’s tech journalist Mark Gurman commented on a recent post by Apple CEO Tim Cook, hinting at a “new family member” announcement, which might refer to this newly named device. Also, there are several new case listings on Amazon tagged for the iPhone 16E, although this could just be speculation.

    Amazon iPhone 16E

    The expected features for this new phone include a bigger 6.1-inch OLED screen, Face ID for security, a powerful A18 processor, a USB-C port, compatibility with Apple’s AI features, and a custom 5G modem. We’ll find out the official price and when it’s coming out tomorrow.

  • Is there really a call for the iPod’s Return?

    Is there really a call for the iPod’s Return?

    Sometimes, I come across posts where people reminisce about the days when iPods were all the rage. I have to admit, the iPod was my introduction to the Apple world. But now, years after its discontinuation, I’m not convinced that people genuinely want the iPod back, despite their claims. Here’s my take on why.

    Apple officially ended the iPod era in 2022 with the discontinuation of the iPod touch, declaring that “music lives on.” However, the iPod had already started fading away much earlier, particularly in 2017 when the last of the iPod nano and shuffle were no more.

    Now, with the iPod gone, there’s a natural nostalgia, and some folks argue for its revival. While I get the sentiment, I think the need for an iPod doesn’t hold up in today’s world.

    A Look Back at the iPod’s Journey

    The original iPod came out in 2001, a time when computers were big and phones weren’t smart. The idea of having a device that could hold “a thousand songs in your pocket” was revolutionary. I remember the thrill of using an iPod for the first time.

    As technology advanced, Apple introduced various iPod models, including the tiny nano and shuffle. These devices were hugely popular, making up 40% of Apple’s revenue in 2006. But the landscape was changing, and Apple knew it.

    Smartphones were getting smarter. When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, he mentioned it would be the best iPod yet, combining music and phone functionalities. He was right; the iPhone made separate music players less necessary.

    Do We Miss the iPod?

    I used to carry both an iPhone and an iPod because early iPhones didn’t have much storage. But as iPhones improved and music streaming became the norm, the need for a dedicated music device dwindled.

    iPod sales hit their peak in 2008 with nearly 60 million units sold, but they started declining from 2009, especially after the iPhone’s introduction. By 2014, when Apple last reported iPod numbers separately, sales had dropped to just 14 million units.

    Why the iPod Might Not Make a Comeback

    Some argue that Apple could make money by bringing back the iPod. Yet, I believe Apple knows better than to expect significant sales from a relaunched iPod. The iPhone mini’s short-lived tenure shows that even when consumers claim to want something, sales might tell a different story.

    Sure, there might be an initial rush to buy an iPod for nostalgia, but long-term demand? Doubtful.

    The Legacy of the iPod

    I keep my old iPod nano on my desk, not just as a reminder of good times but also to understand why we’ve moved on. In our current tech environment, we prefer devices that do it all.

    Apple has essentially continued the iPod’s legacy through devices like the iPhone, iPad, HomePod, and even the Apple Watch, which, in many ways, is like a modern iPod nano. You can listen to music on it independently of your phone. Even with these options, though, I find myself never leaving home without my iPhone.

    So, do people want the iPod back? Probably not. The spirit of the iPod lives on, just in a different, more integrated form.

  • How to stop your Mac from automatically waking up

    How to stop your Mac from automatically waking up

    Apple’s latest Macs with their own special chips are set up to automatically turn on when you open the lid or plug them in. But if you’re not a fan of this, there’s a way to stop it in macOS Sequoia.

    In a helpful guide, Apple explains how you can tweak your Mac so it doesn’t start up when you’d rather it stay off. Here’s what you need to do:

    • Check your macOS: Ensure your Mac with Apple’s chip is running macOS Sequoia or a newer version.
    • Open Terminal: Find the Terminal app in the Utilities folder under Applications.
    • Enter the Command: Type one of these commands into Terminal, then hit Enter:
      • To stop startup when opening the lid or plugging in: [sudo nvram BootPreference=%00](https://x.com/i/grok?text=sudo%20nvram%20BootPreference%3D%2500)
      • To stop startup just when opening the lid: [sudo nvram BootPreference=%01](https://x.com/i/grok?text=sudo%20nvram%20BootPreference%3D%2501)
      • To stop startup just when plugging in: [sudo nvram BootPreference=%02](https://x.com/i/grok?text=sudo%20nvram%20BootPreference%3D%2502)
    • Password Time: You’ll need to enter your admin password (you won’t see the characters as you type), then hit Enter again.

    If you decide you want your Mac to wake up automatically again, just open Terminal and type [sudo nvram -d BootPreference](https://x.com/i/grok?text=sudo%20nvram%20-d%20BootPreference) to undo the changes.

    This little trick lets you control when your Mac decides to come to life, keeping you in charge of your device’s power management.

  • Video Calls from Space: Coming to Europe and the USA soon

    Video Calls from Space: Coming to Europe and the USA soon

    This year, people in Europe will be able to make video calls using satellite technology, thanks to a successful demonstration by Vodafone working together with AST SpaceMobile. The service will soon expand to the United States through AT&T, although it might take a little longer there.

    Just like the current satellite options for texting and calling, this new technology will work in places where there’s no regular phone signal.

    Apple Paved the Way with Satellite Messaging

    For many years, satellite communication was only possible with special equipment. However, smartphones have now caught up. Apple started this trend with its Emergency SOS via Satellite feature in 2022, which lets you contact emergency services from spots with no cell service. They’ve even updated it so you can send messages to your loved ones. Apple started with Globalstar but has now teamed up with SpaceX and T-Mobile to use Starlink’s satellite system.

    Voice and Internet from Orbit

    In 2023, AST SpaceMobile showed that regular phones could do more than just send messages via satellites; they could also make voice calls and use mobile data. They proved this by connecting a call from Maui, Hawaii, to Madrid, Spain, using their BlueWalker 3 satellite. They also managed to achieve a download speed of about 14 Mbps in another test.

    Satellite Video Calls Are Here

    Vodafone and AST SpaceMobile have now shown that video calls are possible too, using typical 4G/5G phones. They made history with the world’s first video call from space, connecting a call from a remote part of Wales where there’s never been mobile internet before. This was done by Vodafone’s engineer, Rowan Chesmer, who called Margherita Della Valle, showcasing the potential for internet access and messaging in areas without coverage.

    Vodafone plans to roll out this service across Europe by the end of 2026, although they haven’t shared how much it will cost yet. Meanwhile, AT&T is testing similar services in the US, but they’ll probably start after Europe. This new technology could change how we stay connected, especially in the most remote places.

  • Truecaller now blocks spam calls on iPhones with iOS 18.2 update

    Truecaller now blocks spam calls on iPhones with iOS 18.2 update

    Truecaller has always been good at spotting spam and scam calls on Android phones, but it didn’t work as well on iPhones because of privacy rules. Now, with the new iOS 18.2 update, iPhones can do what Androids have been doing for a while.

    The old problem with Truecaller on iPhones:

    On Android, Truecaller would look at the caller’s number and match it with a list of known spam numbers. If it found a match, it would warn you or even block the call. But on iPhones, Apple’s privacy rules meant Truecaller couldn’t send the number to its servers like on Android. Instead, it used a local database which wasn’t as good.

    How iOS 18.2 fixes this:

    Apple introduced a new feature called Live Caller ID Lookup API in iOS 18.2. This makes your phone number safe by encrypting it before sending it to Truecaller’s server. The server sends back an encrypted reply which your iPhone then decodes. This method keeps your privacy safe but allows Truecaller to use its big, real-time database to spot spam calls.

    This update also lets Truecaller on iPhones do something users have wanted for ages – automatically block spam calls. Plus, you can now find out who called you from up to 2,000 past numbers in your call history.

    What you need to do:

    • Make sure you have Truecaller version 14.0 or newer on your iPhone.
    • Go to your iPhone’s Settings > Apps > Phone > Call Blocking & Identification.
    • Turn on all the Truecaller options and restart the app.

    Truecaller’s CEO, Rishit Jhunjhunwala, shared that they’re thrilled to bring these features to iPhones, matching what Android users get while still keeping calls private.

    The basic app can identify business calls for free, but to use all these new features, you’ll need a paid subscription. It costs $9.99 a month or $74.99 a year, or you can get a family plan for $14.99 a month or $99 a year which covers up to five people. This update is starting to roll out around the world now.

  • Apple’s new update turns AI on automatically, here’s how to turn it off

    Apple’s new update turns AI on automatically, here’s how to turn it off

    The new iOS 18.3 update is almost here, and it brings some changes to how you use AI on your iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

    Apple Intelligence Now On By Default

    Before, if you wanted to use Apple’s AI features, you had to turn them on yourself when updating to iOS 18.1 or 18.2. But with iOS 18.3, these AI features will turn on automatically when you update your device.

    Here’s what this means:

    • If you’re new to iOS 18.3 or upgrading, Apple Intelligence will automatically start working once you set up your phone. You’ll need to go into your settings to turn these features off if you don’t want them. Just go to the Apple Intelligence & Siri settings and switch off the AI.
    • The same goes for iPads and Macs with the new updates.

    After months of AI Being Available

    Most people who can use Apple’s AI have already turned it on. But for those who haven’t, the update will do it for you.

    There’s one question, though. What if you turned AI off before? Will it turn back on with this update? We’ll need to wait for the official release to know for sure.

    This update doesn’t add many new things, but it does change how notifications work with AI, which has been a hot topic. Apple seems to think that after some time with AI out there, it’s time to make it default.

  • Apple Intelligence now turns on automatically

    Apple Intelligence now turns on automatically

    When you install the new updates for macOS Sequoia 15.3, iOS 18.3, or iPadOS 18.3, Apple Intelligence will start up by itself on devices that can use it, according to Apple’s notes for developers.

    If you’re setting up a new iPhone with iOS 18.3, Apple Intelligence will be on right from the start. After you finish setting up, you can use Apple Intelligence right away. If you want to turn it off, go to the Apple Intelligence & Siri Settings menu and switch it off there. This will stop all Apple Intelligence features on your device.

    Before, with macOS Sequoia 15.1, 15.2, iOS 18.1, and 18.2, you had to turn on Apple Intelligence yourself to use it. Now, it’s on by default, so if you don’t want to use it, you’ll need to turn it off.

    Also, with macOS Sequoia 15.3, Mac users get something new called Genmoji, which lets you make your own emojis. All these updates also make notification summaries better, so you can see when a notification has AI-generated info in it.

    These updates are in testing now with developers and beta testers. They should be available to everyone next week.

  • Big Tech Fines: A drop in the ocean or a Wake-Up Call?

    Big Tech Fines: A drop in the ocean or a Wake-Up Call?

    The world of technology is constantly evolving, pushing boundaries and shaping our modern lives. However, this rapid growth and influence haven’t come without scrutiny. Recent years have seen a surge in regulatory actions against major tech companies, resulting in billions of dollars in fines for various infractions, primarily related to antitrust and competition law violations. But the question remains: are these fines a significant deterrent, or merely a cost of doing business for these corporate giants?

    A recent analysis of tech fines paints a stark picture. While the total sum of penalties levied against major tech players in 2024 reached a staggering $8.2 billion, a closer look reveals a different story. This seemingly enormous figure represents a mere fraction of these companies’ financial power. In fact, most of these tech behemoths could comfortably cover these fines within a matter of days or weeks using their free cash flow – the money left over after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures.

    Consider Apple, for example. The tech giant faced over $2.1 billion in fines last year, primarily for alleged antitrust violations. While this number sounds substantial, it represents just over a week’s worth of the company’s free cash flow. This means that Apple could theoretically pay off all its fines with less than eight days of earnings. This raises serious questions about the effectiveness of fines as a regulatory tool. If these penalties represent such a small portion of a company’s resources, are they truly a deterrent against anti-competitive behavior?

    The analysis also highlighted other tech giants and their respective fine burdens. Google, facing nearly $3 billion in fines, could clear its debt in just over two weeks. Meta, with fines exceeding $1.4 billion, could do the same in under ten days. Even Amazon, despite facing a relatively smaller fine of around $57 million, could pay it off with less than a day’s worth of earnings. These figures underscore the immense financial power of these companies and cast doubt on the efficacy of the current fining system.

    The core issue lies in the disparity between the scale of the fines and the financial resources of the companies being fined. For most individuals or small businesses, a substantial fine can have a devastating impact. However, for these tech giants, billions of dollars can be absorbed with minimal disruption to their operations. This creates a situation where fines are perceived as a minor inconvenience rather than a serious consequence, potentially emboldening these companies to engage in practices that might otherwise be considered too risky.

    One of Apple’s largest fines stemmed from an EU ruling related to competition in the music streaming market. This case, and others like it, highlight concerns about these companies’ dominance and their potential to stifle innovation and competition. When the penalty for breaking competition laws amounts to a negligible portion of a company’s earnings, the incentive to comply with these laws diminishes significantly.

    Experts and industry observers have voiced concerns about this issue, arguing that regulators need to adopt a more impactful approach. The current system of fines, while well-intentioned, fails to address the underlying problem: the immense financial disparity between regulators and the companies they regulate. Some suggest that regulators should explore alternative measures, such as imposing stricter operational restrictions, breaking up monopolies, or even pursuing criminal charges against executives in cases of egregious misconduct.

    The goal of regulation should not be simply to generate revenue through fines, but rather to ensure a fair and competitive marketplace. If fines are not acting as a sufficient deterrent, it’s time for regulators to re-evaluate their strategies and find more effective ways to hold these powerful companies accountable. The future of innovation and competition may depend on it. Creating an environment where all companies, regardless of size, can thrive is crucial. This requires strong competition legislation and, more importantly, robust enforcement. Without it, the current system risks becoming a mere slap on the wrist for the world’s most powerful tech companies.