RPRNA

Search results for: “privacy”

  • Apple stops signing iOS 18.4.1 and iOS 18 adds stronger privacy rules

    Apple stops signing iOS 18.4.1 and iOS 18 adds stronger privacy rules

    Apple now considers iOS 18.4.1 to be unsigned. With this change, it is not possible for people to go back to iOS 18.4 or use iTunes or Finder to restore an earlier version. To ensure iPhones and iPads are always safe and up to date, Apple usually does this. It also ensures your devices are not vulnerable to issues and bugs present in older versions.

    iOS 18.5 does not allow for a backwards update to 18.4.1. Many people are advised to keep their apps updated because the update offers several improvements and bug fixes.

    It’s also worth mentioning that Apple’s iOS 18 contains a privacy feature that has drawn notice. Apple has stopped app developers from using APIs to spy on users. Many apps relied on these APIs to create a personal device signature for users, even when tracking was not allowed. From iOS 18 onward, Apple requires developers to have a helpful reason before using those features.

    Experts who study privacy are praising this decision as a victory for people’s privacy. It brings another barrier to protect your data, reducing chances for secret information collection by companies.

    As a result, iPhones are now even safer for users, promoting their own privacy. Thus, whenever you use iOS 18.5, you not only experience higher performance but also improved privacy.

  • Apple plans AI Glasses and boosts Mac clipboard privacy

    Apple plans AI Glasses and boosts Mac clipboard privacy

    Apple is preparing major updates for macOS and new AI-powered devices, and privacy is a key part of the plan. According to reports, macOS 16 will include a new system that warns users when apps read their clipboard data. This means you’ll get a clear notification if an app accesses copied text, passwords, or any other sensitive content.

    The update builds on Apple’s existing privacy efforts, similar to how iOS shows when apps access the camera or microphone. Users will be able to control which apps can access the clipboard, giving them better security and more control over personal data.

    Meanwhile, Apple is also working on its own pair of AI-powered glasses. These upcoming Apple Glasses may use a new machine learning model called FastVLM, which is designed to run locally and doesn’t require cloud access. This means the glasses could process voice commands, images, and even identify things around you without sending data online—making it more private and faster.

    FastVLM was recently added to Apple’s open-source machine learning tools. It’s built for efficient visual and language tasks, like recognizing objects or reading signs. Apple is likely testing this for wearable tech, which fits the company’s push for on-device AI.

    Overall, Apple’s next big software and hardware updates focus on smarter features and better privacy—something users have been asking for in today’s AI-heavy world.

  • Apple faces Siri privacy payout and App Store legal battle

    Apple faces Siri privacy payout and App Store legal battle

    Apple is dealing with two big legal issues. First, the company agreed to pay $95 million to settle a lawsuit claiming its voice assistant, Siri, recorded private talks without permission. If you owned a Siri-enabled device like an iPhone, iPad, or Apple Watch between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024, and Siri accidentally turned on during a private conversation, you might get up to $20 per device, for up to five devices.

    You need to submit a claim by July 2, 2025, swearing the activation happened during a confidential moment. The final amount depends on how many people claim. Apple says Siri data was never used for ads and settled to avoid more court fights. Meanwhile, Apple is also in a legal tussle with Epic Games over App Store rules. Epic, the maker of Fortnite, won a court ruling saying Apple must let developers tell users about other payment options outside the App Store.

    Apple wants to pause these changes while appealing, arguing it needs time to adjust and protect users. Epic disagrees, saying Apple’s delays hurt competition. The court hasn’t decided yet, but this fight could change how apps handle payments. Both cases show Apple navigating tough legal waters. The Siri settlement offers some users a small payout, while the Epic battle could reshape the App Store’s future. For now, Apple is balancing user trust and business rules as these cases unfold.

    Source/Via

  • Why Apple’s fight for data privacy matters more than you think

    Why Apple’s fight for data privacy matters more than you think

    Apple’s Advanced Data Protection (ADP) is a tool that keeps your iCloud data super safe. Not many people used it before—most regular folks didn’t know about it, and only a few tech fans turned it on. But now, Apple’s battle with the UK government over this feature is a bigger deal than it looks. Here’s why it’s so important.

    The UK’s Big Move Against Privacy

    ADP locks up your iCloud info with something called end-to-end encryption. Only you can unlock it on your own devices—Apple can’t, and neither can anyone else, like the government. The UK wanted Apple to break this lock so they could peek at people’s data, not just in the UK but everywhere. That’s a huge overstep.

    Apple rolled out ADP in 2022, but it didn’t get much attention. It’s not on by default, so only super careful users switched it on—until this fight started.

    Apple’s Sneaky Way of Fighting Back

    The UK’s rules say Apple can’t tell anyone if they’re ordered to unlock ADP. So, Apple got smart. Instead of spilling the beans (which would be illegal), they just said, “Sorry, UK users, we’re pulling ADP from your country.” No explanation—just a big hint. Their message was loud and clear: “We won’t build a secret way into your data, and we never will.” They even took the issue to a special UK court, quietly challenging the order.

    From Quiet Feature to Front-Page News

    The UK and US are buddies in a group called Five Eyes, where they share secrets. Back in 2018, this group said privacy isn’t everything and pushed against strong encryption. However, the UK went too far, demanding access to everyone’s iCloud worldwide. Apple’s clever response got people talking—even in the US. American leaders like Tulsi Gabbard called out the UK for breaking trust. Suddenly, ADP isn’t just for tech nerds—it’s a hot topic.

    Why This Matters

    First, more people now understand how encryption keeps their stuff private. Second, governments see that secret demands won’t stay secret—Apple will find a way to let us know. Third, the US can’t easily try the same trick without looking silly after criticizing the UK. Apple’s not just taking on one country—it’s warning them all: your data stays safe with us.

  • Do app privacy tags affect your download choices?

    Do app privacy tags affect your download choices?

    In 2020, Apple rolled out privacy tags to show users what info an app might grab—like stuff tied to you or used to follow you around online. These tags were a game-changer, shining a light on apps that scoop up too much personal data. For example, you could see Signal barely touches your info, while Facebook Messenger slurps up everything it can for ads or upgrades. The goal? Help people pick apps wisely.

    Lately, though, I’ve noticed folks wondering if these self-reported tags—tucked way down on an app’s App Store page—still sway anyone before they tap “Get.” Apple splits these “privacy nutrition tags” into three types:

    • Data Tied to You: This is stuff like your name, address, email, exact location, or shopping history that’s linked to you, often for ads or tailoring the app. Developers have to spill it if it points back to you.
    • Data Not Tied to You: Info collected but kept nameless, usually to tweak the app. Apple makes sure it can’t be traced back to you.
    • Data That Tracks You: This follows you across apps and sites—like Google or Meta using your device ID for custom ads or selling it to data collectors.

    People get loud about privacy when a hot new app, like Threads, sparks worry. Back then, users scratched their heads over why it listed “Health and Fitness” data with no clear reason. Yet Threads still shot to the top of social media downloads. So, do these tags really matter?

    Here’s the catch: developers report this stuff themselves. Apple trusts them to be honest, which speeds up approvals but can blur the truth. For users, the tags are handy—if you dig for them and know what they mean. But just because they’re listed doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. As Apple pushes privacy hard, the real challenge is teaming up with developers to make things clearer, explain data use better, and keep overstating in check. So, do privacy tags sway your downloads? Maybe—if you’re paying attention.

  • Could Apple lose an important iPhone privacy tool in France?

    Could Apple lose an important iPhone privacy tool in France?

    For almost two years, French officials have been looking into a privacy tool on iPhones called App Tracking Transparency. This feature lets people choose if they want apps to follow their activity for ads or not. You’ve probably noticed those “Ask App Not to Track” messages popping up. Now, according to a recent Reuters story, the investigation is almost over—and it doesn’t look good for Apple.

    France Might Stop This Privacy Feature Soon

    The two-year review of Apple’s App Tracking Transparency in France should finish within the next month. And it seems Apple might not like the result.

    Reuters reporter Foo Yun Chee explains:

    French regulators are likely to tell Apple next month to stop this practice, saying it’s unfair to competition. They’ll probably add a fine too. This would be the first time a government blocks this feature. In France, fines for such issues can reach up to 10% of a company’s yearly earnings worldwide.

    So, two big things could happen when this case ends:

    • Apple may have to turn off this feature for people in France.
    • The company could also face a penalty.

    Back in 2023, when this probe began, we noted: “Apple’s being accused of playing favorites and setting unclear, unfair rules about how user info can be used for ads.”

    Apple shared this comment with 9to5Mac during an earlier debate about the feature:

    “We at Apple think your data is yours. You should decide if it’s shared and with whom. App Tracking Transparency just lets users pick whether apps can track them or pass their info to data collectors. These rules are the same for everyone, including us, and we’ve had lots of support from privacy fans and regulators.”

    Beyond France, Germany and Italy are also checking out this feature. Usually, the worry isn’t the tool itself but how Apple uses it for its apps. In the U.S., companies like Meta have complained the most—not regulators. They say this privacy option has hurt their ad income.

  • AI app banned in South Korea for privacy issues

    AI app banned in South Korea for privacy issues

    In a recent development, users of the AI app DeepSeek in South Korea have hit a snag. The local government has decided to ban the Chinese AI application, citing that it does not follow the country’s data protection rules. As a result, Apple and Google have been instructed to take the app off their app stores in South Korea.

    Temporary Ban on DeepSeek in South Korea

    According to news sources, South Korea’s data protection watchdog has told tech giants like Apple and Google to stop people from downloading this app. However, you can still use DeepSeek through a web browser in South Korea for the time being. The reason given for this ban is that DeepSeek doesn’t meet the requirements set by South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission.

    The company behind DeepSeek has admitted they overlooked some aspects of South Korea’s data laws and has appointed lawyers in the country to deal with the situation. Additionally, a spokesperson from China’s Foreign Ministry has stated that China takes data privacy seriously and ensures it is protected by law.

    Path to Reinstatement

    DeepSeek could start working again in South Korea if it makes changes to align with the local privacy laws.

    For a bit of background, DeepSeek is a Chinese tech startup that became famous for its AI model “R1”, which is both effective and resource-efficient compared to others. The app received praise from Apple’s CEO Tim Cook but has also stirred up controversy because of where it comes from.

    Italy was the first to block DeepSeek for similar privacy concerns, and in the U.S., a senator has proposed a law to penalize the use of Chinese AI apps. Last month, DeepSeek climbed to the top of the U.S. App Store, beating out ChatGPT by OpenAI, and it currently sits at number 13 in app downloads.

    Source

  • Apple faces privacy double standards in Germany

    Apple faces privacy double standards in Germany

    Apple has been under scrutiny in Germany for three years because of its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature. This feature lets iPhone users choose not to have their activities tracked across different apps.

    The German competition authority, Bundeskartellamt, has now shared its initial thoughts, suggesting that Apple’s ATT rules might not be fair. They say that while third-party apps must follow these strict rules, Apple’s own apps do not have to.

    In their latest statement, the Bundeskartellamt pointed out that since ATT was introduced in April 2021, app makers in the iOS App Store need special permission from users to use their data for ads. However, these same strict rules don’t apply to Apple’s apps.

    According to the Bundeskartellamt, this could be against German competition laws for big tech companies and even broader European Union competition rules. They argue that Apple is applying different privacy standards to itself compared to other app developers.

    Apple has now been allowed to reply to these concerns raised by the German authority.

    Interestingly, while ATT was initially seen as a headache for big advertising apps like those from Meta (formerly known as Facebook), it has turned out to be beneficial. Meta has managed to enhance its advertising strategies, using AI to target users more accurately without relying on broad third-party data tracking.

    This situation in Germany highlights ongoing debates about how tech giants manage user data and privacy, setting a precedent for how privacy policies might be enforced in the future.

    Source

  • WhatsApp fixes privacy issue in new iPhone update

    WhatsApp fixes privacy issue in new iPhone update

    WhatsApp has just released an update for iPhones, version 25.2.3, to fix a big privacy problem with its “View Once” option. This option lets you send photos or videos that should vanish after one view, but because of a mistake, people could see them again.

    The Problem

    This issue was only for iPhone users. It let anyone look at the photos or videos they were supposed to see just once by going into the app’s settings, checking storage details, and finding the newest files. This meant the privacy feature wasn’t working as it should.

    How It Was Found

    A security expert named Ramshath wrote about this problem on Medium, which made WhatsApp aware of it and they worked on a solution. Interestingly, this isn’t the first time; last year, they fixed a similar problem on WhatsApp Web.

    New Features

    Along with fixing this issue, the update brings some new things you can do. Now, you can make calls to numbers you haven’t saved in your contacts, and there are better ways to handle group calls.

    What to Do

    If you use WhatsApp on an iPhone, you should update the app right away from the App Store to keep your private photos and videos safe. This update makes sure that when you send something meant to be seen once, it really does disappear after one view.

  • Apple reaffirms commitment to user privacy amidst Siri lawsuit settlement and Apple cash outage

    Apple reaffirms commitment to user privacy amidst Siri lawsuit settlement and Apple cash outage

    In a move aimed at reassuring users about data privacy, Apple has publicly reiterated its dedication to protecting user information collected through its voice assistant, Siri. This announcement comes on the heels of a $95 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit alleging privacy violations related to Siri recordings. Simultaneously, Apple is addressing an ongoing outage affecting its Apple Cash service, causing frustration for many users. 

    The recent lawsuit centered around claims that Siri inadvertently recorded user conversations following accidental activations. Plaintiffs in the case alleged that snippets of these conversations were then shared with third-party advertisers, resulting in targeted ads based on private discussions. Specific examples included individuals claiming to have seen ads for products they had discussed verbally near their Apple devices, such as specific brands of shoes or restaurants, and even ads related to medical treatments discussed with doctors. 

    Apple has consistently denied these allegations, maintaining that Siri data has never been used to create marketing profiles, shared with advertisers, or sold for any purpose. In a statement released earlier this week, Apple explained that the settlement was a pragmatic decision designed to avoid the prolonged and costly process of further litigation, rather than an admission of wrongdoing. 

    To further emphasize its commitment to privacy, Apple has provided a detailed overview of the privacy safeguards built into Siri. A core element of this approach is prioritizing on-device processing. By handling as much data processing as possible directly on the user’s device, Apple minimizes the amount of information that needs to be collected and transmitted to its servers. 

    Apple also emphasizes that Siri searches and requests are not linked to individual Apple accounts. Instead, a randomized identifier is used to track data during processing, ensuring anonymity and preventing the association of Siri activity with specific users. This measure is designed to protect user identity and prevent the creation of individual profiles based on Siri usage.  

    Furthermore, Apple states that it does not retain audio recordings of Siri interactions unless users explicitly opt in to participate in a program designed to improve Siri’s performance. Even when users consent to this program, the recordings are used solely for the purpose of enhancing Siri’s functionality and are not used for any other purpose, such as advertising or marketing. 

    While addressing privacy concerns surrounding Siri, Apple is also currently dealing with a separate issue affecting its Apple Cash service. Users have reported widespread problems with sending and receiving money through the platform, experiencing difficulties such as infinite loading screens and error messages suggesting that Apple Cash needs to be set up even for established users. 

    This multi-hour outage has disrupted peer-to-peer transactions for many Apple users, sparking complaints on social media platforms. Apple has acknowledged the issue on its System Status webpage, confirming that Apple Cash has been experiencing problems since earlier today. The status update indicates that some users are affected and that Apple is working to resolve the issue. 

    It appears that the outage is specifically limited to Apple Cash, Apple’s peer-to-peer payment system similar to services like Venmo, Zelle, and Cash App. Apple Pay, the company’s contactless payment platform for in-store and online purchases, appears to function normally.

    This confluence of events – the Siri lawsuit settlement and the Apple Cash outage – highlights the challenges large technology companies face in maintaining user trust and ensuring the smooth operation of complex digital services. Apple’s proactive approach to addressing both issues, through public statements and ongoing efforts to resolve the Apple Cash outage, demonstrates its commitment to transparency and user satisfaction. The company’s emphasis on privacy protections within Siri aims to rebuild confidence following the lawsuit, while the prompt response to the Apple Cash outage signals a dedication to restoring service functionality as quickly as possible.

    Source/Via

More posts