Search results for: “Google”

  • Apple’s request to join Google lawsuit denied again

    Apple’s request to join Google lawsuit denied again

    Apple is trying hard to protect its big money deal with Google as Google faces legal action for breaking antitrust rules, but the court isn’t helping. Recently, Apple asked for an urgent pause in the case to join in, but the judge said no and decided to keep the case moving forward.

    Google Logo Feature Slack

    Back in November, Apple wanted a bigger say in how the case would proceed, arguing that Google shouldn’t keep breaking the law. The court turned them down, so Apple appealed, but appeals take time. While waiting, Apple asked for the case to stop, but the judge didn’t agree.

    The court believes Apple hasn’t shown it would be badly hurt without this pause, nor has it clearly stated why it needs to be more involved or what new information it could add. The judge also feels that there’s no clear error in the first decision to keep Apple out of the lawsuit. Plus, it’s important to keep moving to stop Google from continuing these illegal actions.

    The court’s ruling pointed out that this case has been going on for over four years now, and any delay would be significant. Moreover, the court found that Google broke the law by making deals with companies like Apple to keep its monopoly in search and ad markets. Allowing Apple’s request for a pause would just let this illegal activity go on, which isn’t good for the public.

    Last year, Google was found guilty of these antitrust violations, with its deal with Apple being a key issue. Google gives Apple billions yearly to be the default search in Safari, and this was deemed illegal. The U.S. government wants to stop Google from making such deals with Apple and others. If Google can’t continue these agreements, Apple could lose billions, yet would still need to offer Google as a search option.

    Google might also face tougher penalties like selling Chrome or separating Android from services like Google Search and the Google Play Store. Apple worries that Google will focus on protecting these assets over their search deal, which is why Apple wants to intervene.

    In their filing for a pause, Apple argued, “If we can’t resolve our appeal before or during the remedies trial, we might just have to watch as the government pushes for harsh changes that could stop us from working with Google for ten years.”

    Apple is now pushing to speed up its appeal to join the lawsuit against Google, with the next phase of the case due to start in April. If they can speed things up, their appeal might be heard before then.

    Source

  • Apple wants more time in Google’s Search case to avoid big trouble

    Apple wants more time in Google’s Search case to avoid big trouble

    The big deal between Google and Apple, worth $20 billion a year for search rights, was found to break competition laws last summer. Although Apple isn’t on trial, what happens in this case could change things a lot for them. So, Apple has asked to slow down the court process.

    Apple Wants a Say in the Case

    Just a few days ago, Apple tried to get its witnesses into Google’s trial but was turned down. Apple isn’t accused of doing anything wrong, but they argued that Google can’t look out for Apple’s interests anymore because Google is busy protecting itself from claims that could break up its business.

    Since they couldn’t bring their witnesses, Apple has now asked for a pause in the court case. They say they need this to keep their rights safe while they appeal the decision.

    Their latest court document explains:

    “If we don’t pause this case, Apple could be hurt in ways we can’t fix later. We might lose our chance to be part of deciding what happens next, like at the trial itself, while they decide on our rights. This gets even worse because of what the other side said in our last meeting.”

    The document also mentions that courts often allow such delays when someone wants to appeal a decision about joining a case, and Apple hopes this court will agree too.

    If Apple can’t join in the way they want, they have a backup plan:

    “At the very least, the court should let Apple see all the case documents as someone not officially in the case until the higher court decides.”

    No matter what, Apple thinks they need to be involved in the court process to some extent to avoid serious damage to their interests.

  • Apple seeks to protect its big money deal with Google

    Apple seeks to protect its big money deal with Google

    Apple is fighting to save its huge money-making deal with Google, which is under threat because Google was found to break competition laws. Apple has asked the court dealing with Google’s legal battle with the U.S. government for some extra time, so they can argue their case before any final decisions are made.

    The U.S. Department of Justice took Google to court over unfair competition in the search market back in 2020. After a long fight, the DOJ won. A big part of this lawsuit was Google’s agreement with Apple, where Google pays billions each year to be the first choice search engine on Apple’s Safari browser. The judge ruled that this deal was against competition laws and helped Google keep its top spot in the search engine world.

    The U.S. government wants to stop Google from making such deals with Apple and other companies, which would hit Apple’s earnings hard. For instance, in 2022, Google paid Apple around $20 billion. Apple already tried to get more involved in the case as the solutions were being discussed, but the court said no because of timing issues. Apple is now appealing that decision and wants a pause while the appeal is considered.

    Apple argues that since its deal with Google is on the line, it should have the right to join the discussion, warning that without this pause, they could be seriously harmed.

    If Apple can’t join in the legal proceedings, they won’t be able to present their own evidence or arguments. If the appeal drags on until or after the trial for solutions starts, Apple might just have to watch, unable to speak or defend itself, while the government pushes for changes that directly affect Apple, like banning any business deals with Google for ten years.

    Besides stopping deals like this one, the U.S. Department of Justice also wants to go further, suggesting Google should sell its Chrome browser and separate Android from services like Google Search and the Google Play Store. Google has a lot to lose and might focus more on saving Chrome than its deal with Apple.

    When Apple first wanted a bigger say in the case, they argued that Google can’t properly look after Apple’s interests anymore because the case covers so much ground. The DOJ, predictably, doesn’t want Apple in the part of the trial where solutions are decided, which is due to start in April.

    If the court rules against Google paying Apple to be the default search on Safari, Apple would still have to offer Google Search as an option, but they wouldn’t get paid for it anymore.

    Source

  • Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    The internet landscape is dominated by a few key players, and the relationship between Apple and Google is a fascinating one. Recently, Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of services, made headlines by declaring the company’s continued commitment to Google as the default search engine on its devices. This decision, fueled by a multi-billion dollar deal between the two giants, raises questions about competition, user privacy, and the future of search itself.

    A Symbiotic Partnership: Billions and Brand Loyalty

    The financial incentive for Apple’s stance is undeniable. Google reportedly pays a staggering $20 billion annually to maintain its position as the default search engine on iPhones, iPads, and Macs. This hefty sum translates to a significant revenue stream for Apple, with an additional 36% of ad revenue generated from Safari searches finding its way back to Cupertino. The partnership also fosters brand loyalty for both companies. Google benefits from the massive user base of Apple devices, while Apple leverages Google’s established search technology, ensuring a seamless user experience.

    Beyond the Money: Resources and Innovation

    However, Eddy Cue’s statement goes beyond just financial gain. He argues that developing a new search engine from scratch would be a resource-intensive endeavor, demanding “billions of dollars and many years.” This investment would divert focus away from other areas of Apple’s innovation pipeline, potentially hindering the development of groundbreaking new products and services.

    Furthermore, Cue emphasizes the dynamic nature of search technology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the way searches are conducted and interpreted. Building a competitive search engine would require constant investment in AI research and development, a gamble with an uncertain payoff.

    The Privacy Conundrum: Targeted Ads vs. User Choice

    A key sticking point in the debate concerns user privacy. Apple prides itself on its commitment to data protection. Building a successful search engine often relies on targeted advertising, a practice that raises privacy concerns. Cue acknowledges this, highlighting that Apple currently lacks the infrastructure and expertise necessary to navigate the world of targeted advertising at scale.

    Interestingly, despite Google being the default option, users retain the ability to choose alternative search engines like Yahoo!, Bing, DuckDuckGo, or Ecosia. This element of user control adds another layer to the conversation.

    Regulators Step In: Balancing Competition and Revenue

    The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) intervention in 2023 throws a wrench into the well-oiled machine of the Apple-Google partnership. The DOJ accuses Google of anti-competitive practices, with the search engine deal used as evidence. Regulators have proposed two remedies:

    1. Maintaining Google as the default search engine but stripping Apple of ad revenue: This approach aims to foster competition by creating a disincentive for Apple to favor Google.
    2. Preventing future deals between Apple and Google altogether: This more drastic measure seeks to dismantle the existing partnership and force both companies to compete on a level playing field.

    Cue vehemently disagrees with both options. He argues that Apple should retain the right to choose partnerships that best serve its users. He believes that the DOJ’s remedies would ultimately “hamstring Apple’s ability to continue delivering products that best serve its users’ needs.”

    The Future of Search: A Collaborative Landscape?

    As the battle between regulators and tech giants continues, the future of search takes center stage. Will the partnership between Apple and Google endure, or will a more fragmented landscape emerge? Perhaps the answer lies in fostering collaboration between tech companies and regulators, creating a framework that promotes innovation, user privacy, and healthy competition within the search ecosystem.

    One thing is certain: the current landscape is far from static. The next generation of search experiences may be powered by AI, prioritize privacy, and cater to user needs in ways we can only begin to imagine. As companies like Apple and Google continue to navigate this ever-evolving landscape, the fight for search supremacy promises to be a fascinating one to watch.

  • Apple doesn’t have a Graveyard of apps

    Apple doesn’t have a Graveyard of apps

    A week ago, Apple surprised everyone by launching a new app and service named “Invites.” However, this launch has led to some unfair criticism about Apple’s approach to apps, suggesting they operate like Google does with its apps.

    Google is well-known for starting new apps and services but then either shutting them down or merging them into something else. A good example is Google Podcasts, which didn’t last long. There’s practically a “graveyard” of Google apps that didn’t make it.

    After the launch of Invites, some people started to think Apple does the same thing with its apps. But is that really true?

    Not Dead Yet

    Take the Apple Sports app, for example. It’s been around for a year now, and it keeps getting better. People love it so much they’re asking for a widget for their phones. It’s clear this app isn’t just left to die; it’s growing in popularity.

    Then there’s the Journal app, which first appeared with iOS 17.2 in December 2023. By the time iOS 18 rolled out, the app had a significant update to version 2.0, bringing new features like search, sort options, audio transcripts, and more. The only thing missing is an iPad version, not updates.

    Apple Music Classical, initially iPhone-only, expanded to include an iPad app and added features like album booklets. It even got a CarPlay app and Siri support.

    Music Memos’ Legacy

    Music Memos was an app for musicians to record their tunes. It lasted for five years before Apple decided to enhance the built-in Voice Memos app instead. Now, Voice Memos can record two tracks at once, which is great for songwriters who use voice and guitar.

    Clips in the Classroom

    Apple Clips isn’t dead either. It’s thriving in educational settings with features like royalty-free music and templates that teachers can use in their lessons. Instead of abandoning it, maybe Apple should focus on making a simpler video editing app like CapCut, but without the ByteDance connection.

    Looking Ahead for Invites

    The future of the Invites app might include tight integration with the Calendar app and could come pre-installed on new iPhones. Its success will depend on turning users into iCloud+ subscribers and having a strong advocate within Apple, similar to how Apple Sports has been championed.

    In summary, Apple’s so-called “hobby apps” aren’t just side projects; they’re part of a broader strategy where apps are nurtured, updated, and sometimes transformed to better serve users.

  • UK demands Apple create Global encryption backdoor

    UK demands Apple create Global encryption backdoor

    The British government has quietly asked Apple to give it full access to every user’s encrypted data stored in the cloud, according to The Washington Post. This secret directive reportedly came last month, compelling Apple to design a backdoor allowing UK security agencies to access encrypted user data around the world. This is a demand that has never been made in any other democratic nation.

    The order was delivered via a “technical capability notice” under the UK’s 2016 Investigatory Powers Act (IPA), which critics call the “Snooper’s Charter.” This law allows law enforcement to force companies to assist in gathering evidence.

    Apple has not commented on this issue. The law makes it illegal for Apple to even acknowledge such a demand from the government. Similarly, the Home Office declined to confirm or deny the existence of such notices, stating it does not discuss operational details.

    A consultant who advises the US on encryption issues said Apple would not be able to inform users that their encryption is no longer secure. A former White House security advisor verified the UK’s order.

    Apple Might Stop UK iCloud Services Over Privacy Concerns

    There’s talk that Apple might pull its encrypted storage service from the UK rather than weaken the privacy promises it made to its users. However, this wouldn’t stop the UK from accessing the service in other countries. Apple has hinted before that it might withdraw services like FaceTime and iMessage from the UK if privacy is compromised. Apple’s Advanced Data Protection, introduced in 2022, allows users to encrypt additional data categories like Photos and Notes, keeping them private even from Apple.

    Google, on the other hand, has made encryption standard for Android backups since 2018. When asked if any government had asked for a backdoor, Google responded that they can’t access encrypted backup data, even with a legal order.

    How to Secure Your iCloud Data

    The IPA was revised in 2023 to let the Home Office potentially ban certain encrypted services. Apple criticized these changes as excessive government control, suggesting they could prevent new security features from being offered globally.

    Apple CEO Tim Cook has always argued against providing backdoors, stating it would invite criminals to access user data. Cybersecurity experts agree, warning that any backdoor could be exploited. Apple’s resistance was notable in 2016 when they fought and won against a US order to unlock an iPhone.

    With increasing cyber threats from state actors, like those from China, US officials are now more focused on cybersecurity than ever, promoting encryption to protect communications. Privacy advocates, like Big Brother Watch, argue that such measures won’t make the UK safer and will instead undermine basic rights and freedoms.

    Source

  • Apple’s new ‘Smart Hub’ could be the home control center we’ve waited for

    Apple’s new ‘Smart Hub’ could be the home control center we’ve waited for

    Apple is rolling out three new home devices this year, and the first one is particularly thrilling. I’m dubbing it the ‘Smart Hub’, and it promises to fill a crucial gap in Apple’s smart home setup.

    Apple Home Gets Its First Real Control Center

    Apple has always backed the idea of a ‘home hub’ with its gadgets. According to their support documents, you could use a HomePod, HomePod mini, Apple TV, or an iPad as your ‘home hub.’ But what does that mean? It just allows you to manage your smart devices from afar, set up automation, and gain a few connectivity perks.

    However, this new Smart Hub will redefine what a ‘home hub’ means by acting as the main control center for your smart home gadgets.

    A New Era for Apple’s Home App

    The original HomePod aimed to be this kind of device, but its reliance on Siri for control has been a limitation. Siri’s performance can be hit or miss, and relying solely on voice commands isn’t ideal for everyone.

    Enter the Smart Hub. This device will not only let you use Siri but also gives you a touch screen to interact with all your smart home gadgets directly. While you can already control your home with various Apple devices like iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watches, none of these are dedicated solely to home control.

    Making Smart Home Control Easy for Everyone

    The Smart Hub will come with a 7-inch square screen, perfect for placing on your kitchen counter, attaching to your fridge, or setting on a console table. It’s designed specifically for managing your smart home, running an operating system tailored for this purpose.

    While some people are comfortable using just Siri for home control, many, especially those less tech-savvy, will appreciate having a physical, visible way to manage their devices. If Apple prices the Smart Hub reasonably, you could have several around your home, providing easy access to your smart home controls wherever you are.

    A Long-Awaited Feature for Apple Home Users

    While Amazon and Google have offered display-equipped home hubs for a while, Apple users have been missing this feature. The Smart Hub might just be the answer they’ve been looking for, bringing a new level of convenience and interaction to Apple’s smart home ecosystem.

    Source

  • Beware of sneaky software thieves on your Mac

    Beware of sneaky software thieves on your Mac

    Mac computers are facing a growing problem with a type of harmful software known as “stealers.” A recent report from 2025 by Malwarebytes, a company that specializes in malware defense, highlights this trend.

    Traditionally, Mac users have mostly dealt with annoying adware or browser hijackers like VSearch or Genieo. However, 2024 marked a shift with a rise in more dangerous malware, specifically information stealers.

    These stealers are crafted to hunt down valuable data such as credit card details, login cookies, cryptocurrency, and passwords. This information is gold for cybercriminals looking to profit from their theft.

    Often, these malicious programs sneak onto your Mac when you’re looking to download legitimate software. Criminals use deceptive ads on search engines like Google or Bing, where you might click on what seems like a real download link but ends up installing malware instead. They target users by customizing ads based on your location, what software you’re looking for, and even your operating system.

    One notorious stealer, called Atomic Stealer or AMOS, first appeared in 2023. Its variant, Poseidon, has become quite popular among hackers. Poseidon claims it can swipe cryptocurrency from over 160 different digital wallets, plus steal passwords from various browsers and some password managers. It disguises itself as popular Mac apps, like the Arc Browser, to fool users into downloading it.

    Malwarebytes warns that with stealers like Poseidon, attackers can not only steal your information but also use it to craft sophisticated scams.

    To protect yourself, always check the source of your downloads. Make sure you’re getting software from trusted developers and not from questionable websites that mimic real ones. This vigilance can help keep your Mac safe from these sneaky thieves.

    Source

  • First ever malware with screen capture reading found in iPhone Apps

    First ever malware with screen capture reading found in iPhone Apps

    For the first time, a type of harmful software that can read what’s on your screen has been spotted in apps from the Apple App Store, according to a report by Kaspersky.

    This new malware, known as “SparkCat,” can look at screenshots on your iPhone to find private information. The main aim of these apps is to find the secret codes for cryptocurrency wallets, making it possible for thieves to steal your bitcoins and other digital money.

    The apps contain a sneaky part that uses a special tool from Google’s ML Kit to read text in pictures. If it sees an image of a crypto wallet, that image gets sent to a server where the attacker can grab it.

    SparkCat has been around since about March 2024. While similar malware was previously found on Android and computers, it’s now made its way to iPhones. Kaspersky found apps like ComeCome, WeTink, and AnyGPT in the App Store with this spying software. However, it’s not clear if these developers put the malware there on purpose or if it was added by someone else attacking the app’s supply chain.

    Once you download these apps, they’ll ask to see your photos. If you say yes, they’ll use their reading tool to scan through your pictures for important information. These apps are still in the App Store and seem to be focusing on people in Europe and Asia.

    While the primary target is crypto information, Kaspersky warns that this malware could also steal other screenshot data, like passwords. This issue isn’t just for iPhone users; similar threats have been seen on Android too, but iPhone users usually think their devices are safer from such threats.

    Apple usually checks all apps before they go into the App Store, so finding malware like this shows a slip in their review process. In this case, the harmful apps don’t show they’re bad, and the permissions they ask for look like they’re needed for the app to work.

    Kaspersky advises against keeping screenshots of important details like crypto wallet codes in your photo collection to protect yourself from such attacks. For more details on which apps are affected and more about this malware, you can visit Kaspersky’s website.

    Source

  • Trump’s tariffs might make Apple products costlier in the US

    Trump’s tariffs might make Apple products costlier in the US

    Apple products in the United States might soon cost more because President Trump has put a 10% tax on imports from China. Even though Apple has been trying to spread out where it gets its parts, most of its gadgets are still made in China.

    Back when Trump was president before, he also put taxes on many things coming from China. Apple managed to get some exemptions, but this new rule seems to apply to everything from China.

    The Chip Tariff That Never Happened

    Trump once talked about putting a huge tax on Chinese-made computer chips, but that didn’t happen. This was good news for Apple since their products use these chips but aren’t chips themselves. People pointed out this would hurt American companies making electronics in the US with parts from China, so the plan was dropped.

    New Tariffs on Everything

    Later, Trump threatened to tax all products from Canada, Mexico, and China. He wanted a 25% tax on items from Canada and Mexico and 10% on Chinese goods. Canada and Mexico promised to tighten border security and fight drug trafficking to avoid these taxes, while also warning they might tax US goods in return.

    Trump decided to wait 30 days before starting the tax on Canada and Mexico, but the Chinese tax began right away. China responded by taxing American products and looking into possible antitrust issues with companies like Apple and Google.

    Impact on Apple

    Now, Apple has to pay an extra 10% on everything it brings in from China. This could mean higher prices for consumers or lower profits for Apple if they decide to cover the cost themselves.

    What Apple Might Do

    While some companies might increase prices, it’s unclear what Apple will do. They’ve done both in the past – raised prices and cut profits. With Trump’s decisions changing often, Apple might wait to see if these tariffs stick around before deciding.

    In summary, Trump’s tariff policies could lead to pricier Apple products. How Apple responds will depend on how long these taxes last and how they affect the market.

    Source