RPRNA

Search results for: “Google Ad”

  • First ever malware with screen capture reading found in iPhone Apps

    First ever malware with screen capture reading found in iPhone Apps

    For the first time, a type of harmful software that can read what’s on your screen has been spotted in apps from the Apple App Store, according to a report by Kaspersky.

    This new malware, known as “SparkCat,” can look at screenshots on your iPhone to find private information. The main aim of these apps is to find the secret codes for cryptocurrency wallets, making it possible for thieves to steal your bitcoins and other digital money.

    The apps contain a sneaky part that uses a special tool from Google’s ML Kit to read text in pictures. If it sees an image of a crypto wallet, that image gets sent to a server where the attacker can grab it.

    SparkCat has been around since about March 2024. While similar malware was previously found on Android and computers, it’s now made its way to iPhones. Kaspersky found apps like ComeCome, WeTink, and AnyGPT in the App Store with this spying software. However, it’s not clear if these developers put the malware there on purpose or if it was added by someone else attacking the app’s supply chain.

    Once you download these apps, they’ll ask to see your photos. If you say yes, they’ll use their reading tool to scan through your pictures for important information. These apps are still in the App Store and seem to be focusing on people in Europe and Asia.

    While the primary target is crypto information, Kaspersky warns that this malware could also steal other screenshot data, like passwords. This issue isn’t just for iPhone users; similar threats have been seen on Android too, but iPhone users usually think their devices are safer from such threats.

    Apple usually checks all apps before they go into the App Store, so finding malware like this shows a slip in their review process. In this case, the harmful apps don’t show they’re bad, and the permissions they ask for look like they’re needed for the app to work.

    Kaspersky advises against keeping screenshots of important details like crypto wallet codes in your photo collection to protect yourself from such attacks. For more details on which apps are affected and more about this malware, you can visit Kaspersky’s website.

    Source

  • Apple’s request to join Google lawsuit denied again

    Apple’s request to join Google lawsuit denied again

    Apple is trying hard to protect its big money deal with Google as Google faces legal action for breaking antitrust rules, but the court isn’t helping. Recently, Apple asked for an urgent pause in the case to join in, but the judge said no and decided to keep the case moving forward.

    Google Logo Feature Slack

    Back in November, Apple wanted a bigger say in how the case would proceed, arguing that Google shouldn’t keep breaking the law. The court turned them down, so Apple appealed, but appeals take time. While waiting, Apple asked for the case to stop, but the judge didn’t agree.

    The court believes Apple hasn’t shown it would be badly hurt without this pause, nor has it clearly stated why it needs to be more involved or what new information it could add. The judge also feels that there’s no clear error in the first decision to keep Apple out of the lawsuit. Plus, it’s important to keep moving to stop Google from continuing these illegal actions.

    The court’s ruling pointed out that this case has been going on for over four years now, and any delay would be significant. Moreover, the court found that Google broke the law by making deals with companies like Apple to keep its monopoly in search and ad markets. Allowing Apple’s request for a pause would just let this illegal activity go on, which isn’t good for the public.

    Last year, Google was found guilty of these antitrust violations, with its deal with Apple being a key issue. Google gives Apple billions yearly to be the default search in Safari, and this was deemed illegal. The U.S. government wants to stop Google from making such deals with Apple and others. If Google can’t continue these agreements, Apple could lose billions, yet would still need to offer Google as a search option.

    Google might also face tougher penalties like selling Chrome or separating Android from services like Google Search and the Google Play Store. Apple worries that Google will focus on protecting these assets over their search deal, which is why Apple wants to intervene.

    In their filing for a pause, Apple argued, “If we can’t resolve our appeal before or during the remedies trial, we might just have to watch as the government pushes for harsh changes that could stop us from working with Google for ten years.”

    Apple is now pushing to speed up its appeal to join the lawsuit against Google, with the next phase of the case due to start in April. If they can speed things up, their appeal might be heard before then.

    Source

  • Apple seeks to protect its big money deal with Google

    Apple seeks to protect its big money deal with Google

    Apple is fighting to save its huge money-making deal with Google, which is under threat because Google was found to break competition laws. Apple has asked the court dealing with Google’s legal battle with the U.S. government for some extra time, so they can argue their case before any final decisions are made.

    The U.S. Department of Justice took Google to court over unfair competition in the search market back in 2020. After a long fight, the DOJ won. A big part of this lawsuit was Google’s agreement with Apple, where Google pays billions each year to be the first choice search engine on Apple’s Safari browser. The judge ruled that this deal was against competition laws and helped Google keep its top spot in the search engine world.

    The U.S. government wants to stop Google from making such deals with Apple and other companies, which would hit Apple’s earnings hard. For instance, in 2022, Google paid Apple around $20 billion. Apple already tried to get more involved in the case as the solutions were being discussed, but the court said no because of timing issues. Apple is now appealing that decision and wants a pause while the appeal is considered.

    Apple argues that since its deal with Google is on the line, it should have the right to join the discussion, warning that without this pause, they could be seriously harmed.

    If Apple can’t join in the legal proceedings, they won’t be able to present their own evidence or arguments. If the appeal drags on until or after the trial for solutions starts, Apple might just have to watch, unable to speak or defend itself, while the government pushes for changes that directly affect Apple, like banning any business deals with Google for ten years.

    Besides stopping deals like this one, the U.S. Department of Justice also wants to go further, suggesting Google should sell its Chrome browser and separate Android from services like Google Search and the Google Play Store. Google has a lot to lose and might focus more on saving Chrome than its deal with Apple.

    When Apple first wanted a bigger say in the case, they argued that Google can’t properly look after Apple’s interests anymore because the case covers so much ground. The DOJ, predictably, doesn’t want Apple in the part of the trial where solutions are decided, which is due to start in April.

    If the court rules against Google paying Apple to be the default search on Safari, Apple would still have to offer Google Search as an option, but they wouldn’t get paid for it anymore.

    Source

  • Apple Maps to add Tesla supercharger locations for Ford EV users

    Apple Maps to add Tesla supercharger locations for Ford EV users

    Apple Maps is getting a big update that will make planning trips easier for people driving Ford Mustang Mach-Es and F-150 Lightnings.

    The Apple Maps feature for electric vehicles (EVs) helps you plan your journey by adding stops for charging when you need them. It keeps track of your car’s battery and looks at things like how fast you’re driving, how high the road goes, and how quick the chargers are to figure out when you should charge and for how long.

    Right now, this feature only works with three cars: the Ford Mustang Mach-E, the Ford F-150 Lightning, and the Porsche Taycan. Last year, Ford started sending out adapters to let these Ford cars use Tesla’s Superchargers. These cars have a CCS charging port, and the adapter changes it to work with Tesla’s NACS plug.

    However, Apple Maps hasn’t known about this yet. It only shows you where to go for CCS stations. But, that’s going to change. Ford’s lead engineer for the Mustang Mach-E, Donna Dickson, mentioned in a forum post that the system will soon know about these changes.

    Soon, you’ll be able to see where compatible Tesla Superchargers are right from the navigation in the new 2025 Mustang Mach-E. These locations are already visible on Google Maps for Android Auto users and will soon appear on Apple Maps for those using Apple CarPlay.

    There aren’t a lot of details yet on how this will all work, but it’s expected that Ford drivers with the NACS adapter can tell Apple Maps they can use both CCS and NACS stations. This will help Apple Maps give better, more accurate advice on where to charge.

    As a Mustang Mach-E driver, I’m excited about this update. I hope Ford and Apple will share more soon.

    If you own an electric car, consider charging it at home with solar panels on your roof. To find a good solar installer, check out EnergySage. It’s a free service where you can get personalized solar quotes, compare them online, and get advice from Energy Advisers. This way, you can save money and make sure you’re getting a quality setup without the hassle of sales calls until you’re ready.

  • Apple named world’s most admired company again

    Apple named world’s most admired company again

    For the 18th year in a row, Apple has been named the World’s Most Admired Company by Fortune magazine.

    Apple Logo

    The Fortune survey involves 3,380 business leaders from various sectors. They rate companies on nine different aspects such as innovation, how good they are for investors, how responsible they are towards society, and how well they attract new employees. Apple came out on top, with Microsoft and Amazon right behind, continuing their tradition of being among the best.

    This year’s 2025 rankings show that tech companies are still leading the pack. Nvidia has climbed to fourth place, a first for them, thanks to their big role in the world of artificial intelligence and making graphics processing units. Nvidia’s chips are key in the AI models created by companies like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft.

    However, it’s not just tech; other types of companies are also doing well. Berkshire Hathaway, Costco, and JPMorgan Chase are also in the top seven. New entries this year in the top 50 include ServiceNow, Taiwan Semiconductor, and Novo Nordisk. An interesting point from this year’s list is that all ten of the highest-ranked companies are from the United States, showing a strong American presence at the top for the second year running.

  • Apple hires new leader to boost Siri and AI

    Apple hires new leader to boost Siri and AI

    Apple is shaking things up inside its company to make Siri and its AI better, according to Bloomberg. They’ve brought in Kim Vorrath, who has been with Apple for 37 years, to lead the AI team under John Giannandrea, who is in charge of AI at Apple.

    Vorrath has a knack for managing big software projects and keeping everything on track. She’s known as Apple’s “bug fixer” and has been a big influence in the company. Before this new role, she was part of the team working on Apple’s AR/VR headset, the Vision Pro.

    This change comes right after lots of talk about how Siri didn’t do well when asked about Super Bowl scores. For a while now, Siri hasn’t been as good as other voice helpers, especially when compared to new AI chatbots.

    Apple has also been dealing with complaints about how its Apple Intelligence summarizes news, sometimes getting things wrong and confusing people. To tackle this, they’re planning to stop these summaries for news and entertainment apps in the next update, iOS 18.3, which should come out soon.

    Despite trying to make Siri better by adding ChatGPT from OpenAI, there are still issues. But Apple is working on it, with plans for more Siri improvements in the iOS 18.4 update and even bigger changes in iOS 19, where they might make Siri like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini.

    Moving Vorrath to the AI team shows that Apple thinks AI is more crucial than their work on Vision Pro. She’s good at organizing tech teams and making their work better. In a note about the change, Giannandrea mentioned that they want to focus on making Siri work better and improving Apple’s own AI systems.

  • Tim Cook Among Tech Leaders Attending Trump’s Inauguration: What It Means for Apple and the Industry

    Tim Cook Among Tech Leaders Attending Trump’s Inauguration: What It Means for Apple and the Industry

    Apple CEO Tim Cook, along with several other prominent tech leaders, will attend the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump. The move underscores the complex relationship between Silicon Valley and Washington, where politics and business interests often intersect.

    Tech Leaders Gather for a Historic Event

    Bloomberg reports that Cook’s attendance reflects a broader trend of engagement between tech executives and Trump’s administration. In the months leading up to the inauguration, major tech companies and CEOs, including Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Mark Zuckerberg (Meta), and Elon Musk (Tesla), have been interacting more closely with the incoming administration. These efforts often involve donations to inaugural funds or direct meetings with Trump and his team.

    Tim Cook personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, signaling Apple’s intent to maintain dialogue with the new administration. This donation follows Cook’s December visit to Mar-a-Lago, where he had dinner with Trump, as well as a congratulatory message Cook posted on social media after Trump’s election victory.

    The Financial Stakes: Tech’s Investment in Political Influence

    Trump’s inauguration fund has reportedly amassed $200 million, thanks in part to contributions from industry leaders and corporations. Companies such as Google, Amazon, Meta, Uber, Toyota, Ford, and GM have also made significant donations. These investments are widely seen as a way to secure favorable policies or avoid potential regulatory roadblocks under the new administration.

    For Apple, this engagement may be particularly strategic. Trump’s stated intention to impose tariffs on imported goods poses a potential challenge for tech companies. Apple has historically worked to minimize the impact of such policies on its operations.

    Tariffs and Tech: Apple’s Delicate Balancing Act

    During Trump’s first term, Apple successfully avoided tariffs on major products like the iPhone, iPad, and Mac, though some tariffs were imposed on accessories such as the Apple Watch, AirPods, and HomePod. In 2019, Trump acknowledged Cook’s arguments against tariffs, stating that the Apple CEO had “made a good case” about how tariffs could disadvantage Apple compared to competitors.

    By attending the inauguration and fostering a relationship with the administration, Cook may be positioning Apple to negotiate exemptions or influence future trade policies that could impact the tech giant’s supply chain and pricing strategy.

    Broader Implications for Tech-Government Relations

    The presence of high-profile tech leaders at Trump’s inauguration underscores a shifting dynamic in Silicon Valley’s relationship with Washington. While the tech industry has traditionally been perceived as leaning toward liberal politics, the pragmatic need to navigate regulatory and trade issues often necessitates bipartisan engagement.

    As the leader of one of the world’s most influential companies, Cook’s actions reflect a balancing act—maintaining Apple’s values while securing its business interests in a politically polarized environment.

    Closing Thoughts

    Tim Cook’s decision to attend Trump’s inauguration is emblematic of the evolving relationship between technology and politics. As the tech industry grapples with challenges ranging from trade policies to antitrust scrutiny, maintaining open lines of communication with government leaders is more critical than ever.

    Cook’s attendance highlights Apple’s commitment to navigating these complexities while safeguarding its position as a global innovator. For tech leaders and companies alike, this moment serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between business and governance in shaping the future of the industry.

  • Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    Why Apple prefers Google Search (and Why Regulators Might Not)

    The internet landscape is dominated by a few key players, and the relationship between Apple and Google is a fascinating one. Recently, Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of services, made headlines by declaring the company’s continued commitment to Google as the default search engine on its devices. This decision, fueled by a multi-billion dollar deal between the two giants, raises questions about competition, user privacy, and the future of search itself.

    A Symbiotic Partnership: Billions and Brand Loyalty

    The financial incentive for Apple’s stance is undeniable. Google reportedly pays a staggering $20 billion annually to maintain its position as the default search engine on iPhones, iPads, and Macs. This hefty sum translates to a significant revenue stream for Apple, with an additional 36% of ad revenue generated from Safari searches finding its way back to Cupertino. The partnership also fosters brand loyalty for both companies. Google benefits from the massive user base of Apple devices, while Apple leverages Google’s established search technology, ensuring a seamless user experience.

    Beyond the Money: Resources and Innovation

    However, Eddy Cue’s statement goes beyond just financial gain. He argues that developing a new search engine from scratch would be a resource-intensive endeavor, demanding “billions of dollars and many years.” This investment would divert focus away from other areas of Apple’s innovation pipeline, potentially hindering the development of groundbreaking new products and services.

    Furthermore, Cue emphasizes the dynamic nature of search technology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the way searches are conducted and interpreted. Building a competitive search engine would require constant investment in AI research and development, a gamble with an uncertain payoff.

    The Privacy Conundrum: Targeted Ads vs. User Choice

    A key sticking point in the debate concerns user privacy. Apple prides itself on its commitment to data protection. Building a successful search engine often relies on targeted advertising, a practice that raises privacy concerns. Cue acknowledges this, highlighting that Apple currently lacks the infrastructure and expertise necessary to navigate the world of targeted advertising at scale.

    Interestingly, despite Google being the default option, users retain the ability to choose alternative search engines like Yahoo!, Bing, DuckDuckGo, or Ecosia. This element of user control adds another layer to the conversation.

    Regulators Step In: Balancing Competition and Revenue

    The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) intervention in 2023 throws a wrench into the well-oiled machine of the Apple-Google partnership. The DOJ accuses Google of anti-competitive practices, with the search engine deal used as evidence. Regulators have proposed two remedies:

    1. Maintaining Google as the default search engine but stripping Apple of ad revenue: This approach aims to foster competition by creating a disincentive for Apple to favor Google.
    2. Preventing future deals between Apple and Google altogether: This more drastic measure seeks to dismantle the existing partnership and force both companies to compete on a level playing field.

    Cue vehemently disagrees with both options. He argues that Apple should retain the right to choose partnerships that best serve its users. He believes that the DOJ’s remedies would ultimately “hamstring Apple’s ability to continue delivering products that best serve its users’ needs.”

    The Future of Search: A Collaborative Landscape?

    As the battle between regulators and tech giants continues, the future of search takes center stage. Will the partnership between Apple and Google endure, or will a more fragmented landscape emerge? Perhaps the answer lies in fostering collaboration between tech companies and regulators, creating a framework that promotes innovation, user privacy, and healthy competition within the search ecosystem.

    One thing is certain: the current landscape is far from static. The next generation of search experiences may be powered by AI, prioritize privacy, and cater to user needs in ways we can only begin to imagine. As companies like Apple and Google continue to navigate this ever-evolving landscape, the fight for search supremacy promises to be a fascinating one to watch.

  • New Danger Alert: Harmful software hiding in the DeepSeek craze

    New Danger Alert: Harmful software hiding in the DeepSeek craze

    Are you tired of hearing about DeepSeek? This popular chatbot from China has taken over tech news and even topped the App Store charts. But with fame comes risk, as it’s now linked to scams, phishing, and dangerous software for Mac users. Here’s what you need to know.

    Welcome to our weekly security update, where we talk about keeping your Apple devices safe amidst the latest threats.

    Scams and Fake Apps

    Cyble, a well-known cybersecurity company, has been tracking various scams that use DeepSeek’s popularity. Scammers are tricking people into scanning QR codes for fake crypto deals or offering fake investments. There are also fake DeepSeek apps for Mac that look real, but the catch is, there’s no official DeepSeek app for Mac.

    Malware Alert

    The latest scam involves spreading AMOS, a notorious type of Mac malware, disguised as a DeepSeek app. AMOS, written in Swift, can work on both Intel and Apple Silicon chips. Hackers charge $1,000 a month to use this malware, which communicates with a cybercriminal’s server to steal your personal data like passwords, credit card details, and more.

    How It Works

    Here’s how you might get tricked:

    • You download a fake DeepSeek app from a website or an email.
    • The scammer tells you to open Terminal and drag a file into it.
    • What looks like a safe file actually runs harmful scripts, putting your Mac at risk.

    Protecting Yourself

    With macOS Sequoia, Apple made it harder for unsigned apps to run, but hackers have found ways around this by using Terminal. Remember, DeepSeek only has apps for iOS and Android, so any Mac version you see is not legitimate. Also, avoid using DeepSeek altogether because of privacy issues; in China, laws allow for extensive data access and censorship.

    Your Thoughts?

    Are you concerned about DeepSeek’s privacy issues? Share your thoughts with us.

    Stay safe out there, and keep your devices secure by being wary of what you download and where it comes from.

    For more on Apple security:

    • DeepSeek has raised privacy alarms, leading to investigations in the US and Europe, with the app already removed from Italy’s App Store.
    • Security flaws named SLAP and FLOP could expose your web tabs on Apple devices.
    • A court has put limits on how much data the FBI can search from tech companies under FISA.
    • Google Ads are still being used by hackers, despite Google’s advanced tech and resources.

    Stay informed and stay safe!

  • Apple’s Long Game: iPhones expected to receive extended iOS 19 support

    Apple’s Long Game: iPhones expected to receive extended iOS 19 support

    For years, iPhone users have enjoyed a significant advantage over their Android counterparts: lengthy software support. While the exact duration fluctuates, Apple typically offers updates for at least five years after a device’s release. This commitment translates to continued security patches, bug fixes, and even major feature upgrades for older iPhones.

    The recent buzz surrounding iOS 19 highlights this philosophy once again. A report by iPhoneSoft.fr suggests a wide range of iPhones, encompassing several generations, are rumored to be compatible with the upcoming update. This list includes the recently released iPhone 16 series alongside models dating back to 2018, such as the iPhone XS, XS Max, and XR.

    This extended support window is particularly noteworthy considering the inclusion of older devices. It suggests that iPhones as old as seven years could potentially receive iOS 19, extending their functional lifespan significantly.

    While the experience on such veteran iPhones might not be identical to the latest and greatest models, it still offers a crucial benefit. Users who cherish their older iPhones can continue to enjoy the security and functionality of a major iOS update, potentially delaying the need for an upgrade.

    This extended support stands in stark contrast to the historical landscape of Android software updates. Traditionally, Android users faced a much shorter window, often receiving updates for just 2-3 years. However, the tide seems to be turning. Major players like Google and Samsung are increasingly prioritizing software support, mirroring Apple’s commitment. These companies now offer updates for up to seven years, a remarkable improvement compared to the past.

    While the gap between Android and iOS in terms of total support duration is narrowing, another crucial factor remains: timeliness. One of the historical frustrations with Android updates has been the lag between their release and their availability on individual devices. Months often elapsed before users of specific phones could experience the latest OS.

    This has prompted Google to adjust its release strategy. Android 16, for instance, is expected to launch in mid-2025 instead of the usual Q3/Q4 timeframe. This shift aims to grant manufacturers more time for optimization and integration, potentially leading to faster and more streamlined rollouts for users.

    In conclusion, Apple’s commitment to extended iOS support continues to be a valuable selling point for iPhone users. The prospect of receiving major updates for older models like the iPhone XS series exemplifies this philosophy. While Android is making strides in the realm of software support, the issue of timeliness remains a hurdle to overcome. As Google adjusts its release strategy and manufacturers prioritize optimization, the landscape for Android updates might evolve further, potentially leading to a more user-friendly experience for Android users in the future.

    Source

More posts