Search results for: “amd”

  • From Taiwan to the Desert: Apple’s chips find a new home in Arizona

    From Taiwan to the Desert: Apple’s chips find a new home in Arizona

    For years, the intricate dance of microchip manufacturing has played out largely overseas, a complex global ballet involving specialized factories and intricate supply chains. But the landscape is shifting, and a significant new act is unfolding in the Arizona desert.

    Recent reports indicate that Apple has begun manufacturing its sophisticated S9 chip, the powerhouse behind the Apple Watch, on American soil for the very first time. This move marks a pivotal moment, not just for Apple, but for the broader semiconductor industry in the United States.   

    The news centers around TSMC’s advanced Fab 21 plant near Phoenix. TSMC, the Taiwanese Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, is a global giant in chip production, and their Arizona facility represents a major strategic expansion beyond their home base. This plant, already producing the A16 Bionic chip that powers certain iPhone models, has now added the S9 to its repertoire.  

    The S9 chip, which debuted in the Apple Watch Series 9 and continues to drive the Apple Watch Ultra 2, is a marvel of miniaturization. It’s a System-in-Package (SiP), meaning multiple components are integrated into a single, compact unit. This intricate design, based on processing features derived from the A16, demands cutting-edge manufacturing processes.

    Both the A16 and the S9 are built using TSMC’s 4-nanometer process technology, often referred to simply as “N4.” This shared technological foundation is key to understanding the recent shift in production. The fact that both chips utilize the same advanced technology has enabled TSMC to efficiently adapt its Arizona production line to accommodate the S9 alongside the A16. It’s like a well-oiled machine, smoothly transitioning to produce a similar, yet distinct, product.  

    This development signifies more than just a change in location. It reflects a broader trend of bringing semiconductor manufacturing back to the United States. The strategic importance of domestic chip production has become increasingly clear in recent years, particularly in light of global supply chain disruptions and geopolitical considerations. Having a domestic source for these critical components reduces reliance on overseas production and strengthens national technological independence.  

    The TSMC Arizona facility is still relatively young, with production capacity in its early stages. The current phase of operation, known as Phase 1A, has a monthly output of approximately 10,000 wafers. These wafers, the raw material for chip production, are shared between Apple’s A16 and S9 chips, as well as other clients like AMD.

    Each wafer can yield hundreds of individual chips, depending on factors like chip size, design complexity, and overall production efficiency. Imagine these wafers as large sheets of silicon, meticulously etched with intricate circuits to create the tiny processors that power our devices.

    The next phase of development, Phase 1B, is expected to significantly boost the facility’s capacity. Projections indicate a doubling of output to 24,000 wafers per month. This expansion represents a substantial investment in American manufacturing and a commitment to growing the domestic semiconductor industry.

    The production of Apple’s S9 chip in Arizona is a significant milestone. It’s a testament to the advancements in American manufacturing capabilities and a sign of things to come. This move not only strengthens Apple’s supply chain but also contributes to the revitalization of the U.S. semiconductor sector, bringing high-tech jobs and expertise to American soil. It’s a story of innovation, strategic planning, and the ongoing evolution of the global technology landscape, playing out in the heart of the Arizona desert.

    Source

  • How a beachcomber and an iPhone’s Medical ID reunited a lost device with its owner

    How a beachcomber and an iPhone’s Medical ID reunited a lost device with its owner

    The ocean holds many secrets, and sometimes, it returns unexpected treasures. Recently, a heartwarming story emerged from the shores of Brazil, highlighting the unexpected utility of Apple’s Medical ID feature. Thiago Itagaki was enjoying a swim at Maresias beach when he stumbled upon a submerged iPhone. The device lay three meters deep and about ten meters from the shoreline. After inquiring among beachgoers without success, Thiago took the phone home, determined to find its owner.

    The iPhone was completely drained of power and encased in a cover holding three credit cards. Thiago carefully dried the device and, after charging it, discovered the Medical ID feature. This often-overlooked function allows users to store crucial information, accessible even without unlocking the phone, for emergencies. This data includes allergies, blood type, and, crucially for this story, emergency contacts. Thiago contacted the number listed under “Love,” successfully reaching the iPhone’s owner.

    The owner, a resident of São Paulo, had lost the phone during New Year’s Eve celebrations. Unbelievably, the device had spent four days underwater. The owner, who had long given up hope of recovery, was overjoyed. The story quickly gained traction online, demonstrating how technology can unexpectedly bridge the gap between strangers and reunite lost possessions. This incident serves as a potent reminder of the importance of keeping one’s Medical ID updated, a simple step that can have profound consequences. While iPhones boast water resistance, this incident highlights the feature’s limitations and the importance of backup plans.

    The Chip Battle: AMD’s Claims and the Missing Piece of the Puzzle

    The tech world is constantly abuzz with competition, particularly in the realm of processors. Recently, AMD unveiled its new Ryzen AI Max laptop chip, making bold claims about its performance relative to Apple’s M4 series. However, a closer look reveals a significant omission in their comparative data.  

    AMD’s Ryzen AI Max, a 16-core chip designed for AI and graphics-intensive tasks, is positioned as a powerhouse for creators and gamers. To demonstrate its capabilities, AMD presented benchmark comparisons against Apple’s M4 chips, commonly found in MacBook Pros. The comparisons included the 12-core M4 and the 14-core M4 Pro, showcasing the Ryzen AI Max’s advantages in various rendering workloads. In some benchmarks, the Ryzen showed significant leads, bolstering AMD’s claims of superior performance.  

    However, a critical detail was missing: the 16-core M4 Max. This omission raises serious questions about the validity of AMD’s comparisons. The M4 Max, with its significantly more powerful GPU (up to 40 cores compared to the M4 Pro’s 20), represents the top tier of Apple’s silicon. By excluding this crucial chip from the benchmarks, AMD painted an incomplete picture. While the Ryzen AI Max might outperform the lower-tier M4 chips in certain tasks, its performance against the M4 Max remains unknown.

    This selective comparison raises suspicion that the M4 Max would outperform the Ryzen AI Max in relevant benchmarks, particularly those heavily reliant on GPU performance. By focusing on less powerful configurations, AMD avoids a direct comparison that could potentially undermine their marketing narrative.

    The presentation highlighted the Ryzen AI Max “winning easily against the 12-core [M4] and trading blows with the 14-core [M4 Pro],” conveniently sidestepping the elephant in the room. This strategic omission suggests a deliberate attempt to present the Ryzen AI Max in the best possible light, without providing a complete and fair comparison against Apple’s full range of silicon.

    The tech community has already picked up on this discrepancy. Online discussions and comments sections are filled with users pointing out the missing comparison, suggesting that AMD is trying to maintain relevance in a market where Apple has made significant strides with its silicon. This highlights the importance of critical analysis when evaluating performance claims and the need for comprehensive data to draw accurate conclusions.

    Source/Via