RPRNA

Search results for: “mi 9t”

  • New iPhone 17 models show off metal and glass design

    New iPhone 17 models show off metal and glass design

    Apple fans are buzzing with excitement as early versions of the iPhone 17 have popped up online. These dummy units, which aren’t working phones but give a sneak peek at the design, reveal a cool mix of metal and glass parts. Shared by a trusted source on X, the images hint at what’s coming when the iPhone 17 launches later this year.

    The dummy models suggest Apple is sticking with its classic look but adding some fresh twists. The sides appear to be made of strong metal, likely aluminum or stainless steel, giving the phone a sturdy and premium feel. Meanwhile, the back is a smooth glass surface, which not only looks sleek but might also support wireless charging. This combo of materials keeps the phone stylish and practical.

    One big thing that stands out is how the metal frame and glass back seem to blend perfectly. The design looks clean and modern, with no rough edges. Some people think this could mean better durability, though glass backs can still crack if dropped. It’s a trade-off for that shiny, high-end vibe Apple loves.

    These early models also show off different sizes, hinting that the iPhone 17 lineup might include options for everyone—whether you like a smaller phone or a bigger one. Camera bumps are visible too, suggesting Apple’s keeping its focus on top-notch photography.

    Of course, these are just dummy units, so things could change before the official release. Apple might tweak the design or materials based on testing and feedback. Still, the leaked images have sparked tons of chatter online, with fans guessing what else the iPhone 17 will bring. Will it have new colors? Better battery life? Only time will tell.

    For now, these glimpses of the iPhone 17’s metal-and-glass style have people excited. It’s a sign Apple’s cooking up something fresh yet familiar. Stay tuned for more updates as the launch gets closer!

  • Apple fixes password app flaw that risked user safety

    Apple fixes password app flaw that risked user safety

    Apple recently patched a problem in its Passwords app with the iOS 18.2 update in December. This flaw had put users at risk of phishing attacks for three months, ever since iOS 18 came out.

    What Went Wrong with the Passwords App

    A report from 9to5Mac highlighted an Apple security note revealing that the Passwords app was sending unprotected requests for website logos and icons tied to saved passwords. Normally, encryption keeps this data safe, but without it, anyone on the same Wi-Fi network could trick users into visiting a fake site designed to steal their login info. Security experts from Mysk first noticed this issue and told Apple about it in September.

    How Apple Described the Fix

    In the iOS 18.2 security notes, Apple explained the problem simply:

    • Effect: Someone with network access might steal private details.
    • Solution: The app now uses HTTPS to send data securely.

    Apple also confirmed they fixed this across other devices like Macs, iPads, and Vision Pros, not just iPhones.

    Why It Matters

    This glitch left users exposed for months, but Apple’s update finally closed the gap. It’s a reminder that even big companies can miss things—though they acted once the issue was clear. If you’re on iOS 18, grabbing the latest update keeps your info safer from sneaky attacks like these.

  • Apple’s strongest Mac yet lacks one cool trick

    Apple’s strongest Mac yet lacks one cool trick

    Apple’s brand-new Mac Studio, powered by the M4 Max or M3 Ultra, is now out for everyone to grab. To go along with its release, Apple updated a help page that shows which power settings this Mac Studio can use—and which ones it skips. The result might catch you off guard.

    Yes, the Mac Studio has a Low Power Mode, but it’s missing High Power Mode. Early reviews say this Mac Studio is the most powerful Mac Apple has ever built. Whether you pick the M4 Max or M3 Ultra version, you’re getting a machine that’s a total beast.

    But what if you want to tone down all that strength sometimes?

    Apple’s updated help page about Power Modes (spotted by MacRumors) says the new Mac Studio lets you switch on Low Power Mode. Why would you bother? Apple explains it does two handy things: it keeps the fans quiet for jobs needing silence and cuts down on energy use if your Mac stays on all the time. These are solid perks for a feature you might think isn’t needed on a Mac Studio.

    Here’s the odd part, though: High Power Mode isn’t an option. Apple says High Power Mode lets the fans spin faster, giving extra cooling so the system can handle super heavy tasks better. When it’s on, you might notice more fan noise. It sounds like a great fit for a machine as strong as the Mac Studio, right?

    But for some reason, it’s not included. You can use High Power Mode on certain MacBook Pros and even the M4 Mac mini, but can you use it on the new Mac Studio? Nope, it’s left out. This missing feature stands out since the Mac Studio is such a powerhouse. It’s a curious choice by Apple that’s got people scratching their heads!

  • Brazil gives Apple 90 days to open iOS to outside apps

    Brazil gives Apple 90 days to open iOS to outside apps

    After the European Union pushed Apple to make big changes to iOS and the App Store for users in Europe, other nations started looking into Apple’s rules too. Now, a court in Brazil has decided that Apple has just 90 days to let iPhone users in Brazil download apps from places other than the App Store, a process called sideloading.

    Apple Faces New Rules in Brazil

    According to the Brazilian newspaper Valor Econômico (mentioned by O Globo), a judge in Brazil said on Wednesday that Apple must allow apps from outside its store, just like it did in Europe. The judge believes Apple’s strict rules stop new companies from joining the market and competing fairly.

    Back in November 2024, Brazil’s competition watchdog, called Cade, told Apple it could no longer block app makers from selling digital items or sharing apps outside the App Store. Apple was given 20 days to follow the rules or face a fine of over $40,000 per day. Apple fought back, asking for more time, and a judge agreed, saying the changes weren’t urgent. Apple argued that quick changes could hurt its business. Last month, the company attended a public meeting in Brazil about this issue.

    Court Sets a Deadline

    Now, Judge Pablo Zuniga has made it clear: Apple has three months to update iOS in Brazil. He pointed out that Apple already follows similar rules in other countries without major problems, so it shouldn’t be a big deal here, either.

    The trouble started when Mercado Libre, a huge online shopping company in Latin America, complained that Apple forces app makers to use its payment system. Other businesses, like Match (which runs Tinder) and Epic Games, also told Brazil’s regulators they weren’t happy with Apple’s rules.

    An Apple spokesperson told Valor Econômico that the company loves “lively and fair markets” and competes hard everywhere it works. But Apple warns that these changes might make iOS less safe and private for users. The company plans to fight the decision in court.

  • New iPhone ‘Fold’ idea feels smarter after latest news

    New iPhone ‘Fold’ idea feels smarter after latest news

    We’re still more than a year away from Apple’s first foldable iPhone hitting the shelves. Rumors have been swirling for a while, but a fresh report from an expert suggests we’ve been picturing it wrong. This new twist makes the iPhone ‘Fold’ sound way more exciting and practical than before.

    The Foldable iPhone Is Finally Taking Shape

    Talk about a foldable iPhone used to feel like a far-off dream, kind of like the Apple Car that never happened. For years, people guessed Apple would jump into the foldable game soon, but those claims didn’t hold up. Now, in the last year or so, things have changed. Trusted names like Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, Ming-Chi Kuo, and The Information say it’s real—and Apple’s aiming for a fall 2026 release.

    From Flip Phone to Book-Style Design

    Last summer, the buzz was all about a flip-phone-style iPhone—one that folds top to bottom. It’d be tiny when closed and stretch into a taller screen when opened. But the latest news flips that idea completely. Ming-Chi Kuo, who’s great at digging up supply chain secrets, says the foldable iPhone will open like a book. Picture this: a smooth 7.8-inch screen inside and a 5.5-inch display outside. That’s a big shift from what we thought before, and it’s got me feeling relieved and curious. Why? Because this book-style setup just clicks better.

    A Handy Mix of iPhone and iPad Mini

    I’ve always loved the iPad Mini—it’s small but mighty. These days, I stick to my 13-inch iPad Pro for work, and juggling another device alongside my iPhone feels like too much of a hassle. But this foldable iPhone could be the best of both worlds. With a screen that unfolds to nearly 7.9 inches—super close to the iPad Mini’s size—it’d be a phone when I need it and a mini tablet when I want more.

    Why This Feels Like a Win

    A top-down fold seemed odd and not very useful to me. But a book-style iPhone? That’s a fresh take—combining pocket-friendly size with a bigger screen for real tasks. It’s not just Apple chasing a trend; it’s a smart new option. I’m already looking forward to hearing more about this 2026 surprise!

  • Apple beats lawsuit over iCloud storage pricing

    Apple beats lawsuit over iCloud storage pricing

    For many iPhone users, iCloud storage is a tricky topic. The free 5GB plan often feels too small, but paying monthly for extra space isn’t everyone’s favorite choice. Recently, Apple faced a lawsuit in the US about how it handles iCloud pricing, but a judge threw the case out.

    Judge Tosses Out Claims Against Apple

    According to Mike Scarcella at Reuters, a lawsuit accusing Apple of unfairly controlling the digital storage market and overcharging for iCloud was dismissed. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee in San Jose, California, ruled that the people suing Apple didn’t prove the company broke any federal or state competition laws. She did, however, give them a chance to rewrite and resubmit their case.

    The lawsuit claimed Apple forced iPhone users into using iCloud by making it the only option for backing up important data, like device settings. The people suing said this gave Apple too much control, letting it charge higher prices for storage. Apple strongly disagreed with these accusations.

    Why the Case Didn’t Hold Up

    Judge Lee wasn’t convinced by the arguments. She pointed out that if Apple’s prices were so high, other companies would jump in to offer cheaper options and steal customers. She also said there’s no proof that users have to buy iCloud storage or that Apple unfairly dominates the cloud storage world.

    What This Means

    From my view, this ruling suggests Apple’s iCloud plans—like the free 5GB tier and the paid options—aren’t going anywhere soon. The company came out on top this time, and unless the lawsuit gets a major redo, things will likely stay the same for iPhone users.

  • Why is the iPhone 16e so close to having MagSafe?

    Why is the iPhone 16e so close to having MagSafe?

    One of the strangest things about the iPhone 16e is that it doesn’t fully support MagSafe. This missing feature surprised so many people that Apple felt the need to explain why they left it out. But here’s the twist: the phone seems to be almost ready for MagSafe, which makes the decision even more puzzling.

    Three Great Things About MagSafe

    The iPhone 16e comes with plenty of top-notch features, but MagSafe isn’t one of them. That’s a big deal because MagSafe brings three awesome perks. First, it makes wireless charging super simple. You just place your phone near the charger, and it snaps right into the perfect spot—no more fumbling around.

    Second, it speeds up wireless charging. Older Qi chargers topped out at 7.5 watts, but MagSafe and Qi2 bump that up to 15 watts. Other iPhone 16 models even hit 25 watts with the newest MagSafe chargers. Third, MagSafe unlocks a bunch of cool accessories—like car mounts, wallets, and camera stabilizers—that stick to your phone with magnets.

    Apple’s Odd Explanation

    Apple’s reason for skipping MagSafe? They say the people buying the 16e don’t use it. According to them, this phone is aimed at folks who prefer plugging in a cable over wireless charging. They think these buyers are upgrading from older models like the iPhone SE or iPhone 11, which didn’t have MagSafe. But that logic feels shaky—those phones didn’t have MagSafe, so of course those users didn’t rely on it!

    The iPhone 16e’s Hidden Surprise

    Here’s where it gets interesting. David Price from Macworld found that the iPhone 16e actually has some MagSafe magnets inside—it’s just not strong enough to work perfectly. I tested this myself by taking my 16e out of its case and placing it near an old MagSafe charger. To my surprise, the charger stuck to the phone! The connection was weak, but it held. Price even shared a video showing the charger lifting off a table to snap onto the phone.

    The catch? This only works without a case, and the magnets aren’t powerful enough to hold the phone on a standing dock. Still, it’s odd that Apple included some magnets but didn’t go all in on MagSafe. Why get so close and then stop?

  • Could an Apple camera lens boost your iPhone photos?

    Could an Apple camera lens boost your iPhone photos?

    Xiaomi has built its name by mimicking Apple’s ideas, but recently, it’s come up with a few tricks I’d love to see Apple borrow. First, it wowed us with the sleek look of its 15 Ultra phone. Now, it’s teasing a cool concept that could inspire an awesome Apple Camera Lens add-on for iPhones.

    My iPhone is my go-to camera. Why? It’s always in my pocket. A few years back, it even became my main camera for trips. Sure, I still grab a standalone camera for special photo outings or unique destinations worth the extra gear. But Xiaomi’s latest idea might just bridge the gap perfectly.

    Smartphone cameras have tiny sensors and small plastic lenses, which limit their quality. Xiaomi’s fix? A real camera lens with a big sensor that snaps onto your phone magnetically. You’d still use the built-in lenses for quick shots, but for top-notch photos, this add-on turns your phone into something like a lightweight mirrorless camera—smaller and easier to carry than a separate one.

    Simon Hill from Wired tested a working version and loved it. He tried a Xiaomi 35-mm f/1.4 lens paired with a 100-megapixel sensor—way bigger than anything in phones today. It has a flexible aperture, perfect for dim lighting. Hill said it attached like a MagSafe wallet and felt like using a real camera, with sharp results to match.

    It comes with an autofocus motor—just tap the screen to pick your focus. Plus, there’s a physical ring for hands-on adjustments. In Pro mode, it worked as smoothly as the phone’s regular camera, letting Hill focus on objects near and far for a soft, natural background blur. We don’t know if Xiaomi will sell this lens, but I’m sold on the idea. Imagine Apple teaming up with Nikon, Canon, or Sony to make one for iPhones. It’d be a game-changer for phone photography!

  • A strange iMessage problem Apple needs to solve

    A strange iMessage problem Apple needs to solve

    For the last couple of years, I’ve noticed something odd with Apple’s Messages app, especially when it comes to pictures. I keep hoping Apple will fix it, but so far, they haven’t done anything about it. Here’s the issue: if you send an AVIF picture through iMessage, it doesn’t show up right. AVIF is a type of image that’s getting more popular, so this glitch is kind of frustrating.

    But that’s not the whole story. It’d be fine if Apple just didn’t work with AVIF files at all. Instead, for some strange reason, the image pops up in a tiny box on your screen. There’s no way to make it bigger, so you’re stuck squinting at a super small picture you can’t see.

    This happens on both iPhones and Macs. The funny thing is, before you send the AVIF picture, it looks perfectly fine in the preview. You’d never guess there’d be a problem until after you hit send. It’s not like Apple doesn’t know how to handle AVIF. They added support for it in Safari with iOS 16, which was over two years ago. So, they’re halfway there—they just haven’t updated iMessage to keep up. The files show up, but you can’t view them properly.

    This whole thing feels off. Since AVIF works in Safari and the Photos app, people naturally send these images through iMessage. But when they don’t display correctly, it’s a letdown. You’re left with a useless picture.

    I hope Apple tackles this soon. It’s a small but annoying issue that messes up the experience. With AVIF becoming more common, it’s time for iMessage to catch up and let us see those images the way they’re meant to be seen.

  • Do app privacy tags affect your download choices?

    Do app privacy tags affect your download choices?

    In 2020, Apple rolled out privacy tags to show users what info an app might grab—like stuff tied to you or used to follow you around online. These tags were a game-changer, shining a light on apps that scoop up too much personal data. For example, you could see Signal barely touches your info, while Facebook Messenger slurps up everything it can for ads or upgrades. The goal? Help people pick apps wisely.

    Lately, though, I’ve noticed folks wondering if these self-reported tags—tucked way down on an app’s App Store page—still sway anyone before they tap “Get.” Apple splits these “privacy nutrition tags” into three types:

    • Data Tied to You: This is stuff like your name, address, email, exact location, or shopping history that’s linked to you, often for ads or tailoring the app. Developers have to spill it if it points back to you.
    • Data Not Tied to You: Info collected but kept nameless, usually to tweak the app. Apple makes sure it can’t be traced back to you.
    • Data That Tracks You: This follows you across apps and sites—like Google or Meta using your device ID for custom ads or selling it to data collectors.

    People get loud about privacy when a hot new app, like Threads, sparks worry. Back then, users scratched their heads over why it listed “Health and Fitness” data with no clear reason. Yet Threads still shot to the top of social media downloads. So, do these tags really matter?

    Here’s the catch: developers report this stuff themselves. Apple trusts them to be honest, which speeds up approvals but can blur the truth. For users, the tags are handy—if you dig for them and know what they mean. But just because they’re listed doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. As Apple pushes privacy hard, the real challenge is teaming up with developers to make things clearer, explain data use better, and keep overstating in check. So, do privacy tags sway your downloads? Maybe—if you’re paying attention.

More posts