RPRNA

Search results for: “mi 9t”

  • MacBook Pro ruined in car crash, AppleCare+ claim rejected

    MacBook Pro ruined in car crash, AppleCare+ claim rejected

    A MacBook Pro owner shared a frustrating experience on Reddit after his laptop was wrecked in a car accident. Despite having an AppleCare+ plan for accidental damage, Apple declined to replace or repair the device.

    The user explained on the platform that his MacBook was severely damaged in the crash. He was shocked to learn that Apple wouldn’t cover the repair or replacement because the damage was considered too extensive.

    “I thought I was safe with AppleCare+ for accidents,” he lamented. “But they won’t replace my MacBook because it’s too broken. It feels like my money was spent for nothing.”

    Apple’s AppleCare+ policy clearly states that it covers accidental damage from handling, which includes unexpected events like drops or spills. The policy specifies that Apple can either repair the damage using genuine parts or replace the device with one that meets their standards.

    However, the policy also lists several exclusions. Two might apply here:

    • Natural Disasters: The policy does not cover damages from events like fire, floods, or earthquakes. Interestingly, it also mentions “similar external causes,” which might be interpreted to include a car crash, although this seems like a stretch.
    • Reckless Behavior: Damage resulting from reckless, abusive, or intentional actions is also not covered. Since the driver admitted the crash was his fault, one could argue that his driving might qualify as reckless, though this interpretation seems harsh.

    The situation raises eyebrows about the application of these policy terms. Accidental damage insurance is supposed to protect against, well, accidents. Excluding coverage because the damage is “too severe” or interpreting a car accident as “reckless behavior” seems to miss the point of such insurance.

    In conclusion, this case illustrates a potential gap between consumer expectations and the fine print of insurance policies. It’s a reminder for all of us to read and understand the specifics of our coverage, especially when it comes to high-value items like electronics.

    Source

  • Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

    Macworld argues that Samsung’s latest Galaxy S25 has taken inspiration from over a dozen iPhone features. From the phone’s sleek, straight-edged design to how its AI assistant displays, Samsung seems to have borrowed quite a bit from Apple.

    Macworld’s Mahmoud Itani highlights this, starting with the AI features. The Galaxy S25 has integrated AI similar to Apple’s, allowing users to connect with third-party chatbots like Google Gemini, just as Apple does with ChatGPT in its system. When activating Gemini on the Galaxy S25, users see a text box with a colorful, glowing border, which looks a lot like Siri’s interface on iPhones. Additionally, the text selection tool in Samsung’s phone mimics Apple’s Writing Tools, offering options to proofread or transform text into tables.

    Itani goes on to mention other features like the ability to record and summarize calls, perform natural language searches in the photo gallery, and a photo editing tool that resembles Apple’s Image Playground. There’s also a new feature similar to Apple’s Live Activities, called the Now Bar, and enhanced audio features for video recording akin to Apple’s cinematic audio.

    9to5Mac’s Viewpoint
    It’s clear that Samsung often looks to Apple for inspiration. Their strategy seems to involve quickly bringing to market features similar to those rumored or leaked for upcoming iPhones, aiming to beat Apple to the punch. However, Apple isn’t innocent of copying either, as both companies tend to adopt similar technologies once they’re mainstream.

    Ultimately, this mutual borrowing is beneficial. The competitive pressure drives each company to innovate and perfect their offerings, leading to better products for consumers.

  • Judge finds possible evidence that Apple paid women less than men

    Judge finds possible evidence that Apple paid women less than men

    A judge has decided that there’s a good chance Apple might have paid female employees less than their male counterparts, allowing a lawsuit from 12,000 current and former female workers to move forward.

    Apple’s Admission and Defense

    Apple has admitted there are differences in pay but insists these differences are due to individual circumstances, not deliberate discrimination.

    The Controversy Over Pay

    This issue was first highlighted in 2021 through an internal employee survey which revealed a 6% pay gap between men and women in technical positions. The survey showed men in middle-level tech roles earning about 6.25% more than women, and white employees earning 5.06% more than non-white employees in similar roles. The survey also pointed out that non-white workers received stock grants 11% later than white employees in entry and mid-level positions. Following this, Apple banned further internal pay surveys.

    The Lawsuit Against Apple

    Last year, a class action lawsuit was initiated under the California Equal Pay Act, claiming that Apple underpaid women. Apple tried to get the case thrown out, arguing the pay differences were fair based on individual factors. However, the judge disagreed, finding enough evidence to let the lawsuit proceed.

    Judge’s Ruling

    California Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman’s ruling denied Apple’s request to dismiss the allegations, agreeing that there was a “reasonable possibility” of widespread unequal pay in Apple’s engineering, AppleCare, and marketing departments.

    Three Points of Discrimination

    The lawsuit points out three main issues:

    • Salary History in Recruitment: Asking for past salaries or salary expectations during hiring could perpetuate existing pay gaps. Although Apple stopped asking for salary history, they still inquire about salary expectations, which might disadvantage women who tend to negotiate less aggressively.
    • Performance Reviews: There’s an accusation that performance evaluations might favor men over women, where similar behaviors are assessed differently based on gender.
    • Talent Reviews: These reviews allegedly lead to unequal pay for men and women of similar talent levels.

    Apple’s Response

    Apple has not commented on the recent judicial decision but has previously emphasized its commitment to pay equity, stating they do not base offers on salary history and regularly review compensation to ensure fairness.

    This case will continue as Apple prepares to defend its practices in court.

    Source

  • How the Apple Watch helped a business leader quit drinking

    How the Apple Watch helped a business leader quit drinking

    The Apple Watch has become known for helping people in emergencies, but for one business leader, it offered life-changing insights.

    John Mackey, who started Whole Foods, decided to stop drinking three years ago after looking at the information his Apple Watch gave him. He told Business Insider that the decision was one of the best he’s made. “I wish I had stopped drinking 30 years ago,” Mackey said, reflecting on the years he could have felt better.

    Mackey found that his Apple Watch was key in this life change. He used it to keep track of his sleep. “Some nights I slept well, others not so much,” he observed. This led him to think about what he did differently on those bad sleep nights.

    With the help of his Apple Watch and the AutoSleep app, Mackey noticed patterns. More exercise and lighter dinners helped him sleep better. But the real eye-opener was his deep sleep, or the lack of it, when he drank.

    In a podcast last year, Mackey explained how the watch influenced his decision. “It changed my life. It helped me stop drinking over two years ago,” he said. He explained how even one drink would ruin his deep sleep, making his total sleep time decrease by about an hour.

    “I didn’t want to give up alcohol because I enjoyed it,” Mackey admitted. But the evidence was clear: alcohol meant no deep sleep. He had to choose between a good night’s sleep or a drink, and he chose sleep.

    For Mackey, better sleep has meant a better life. His experience underscores how useful the sleep tracking features on newer Apple Watch models can be, including the Series 9, Series 10, and Ultra 2, which can even detect signs of sleep apnea.

    This story shows how technology, in this case, the Apple Watch, can lead to significant personal improvements by providing clear insights into our daily habits.

    Source

  • iPhone Update: A small feature pause for better results

    iPhone Update: A small feature pause for better results

    The new iOS 18.3 update is almost here, and it brings some new stuff like better camera controls, AI tweaks, and fixes for bugs. But, there’s one feature that won’t be around for a bit.

    One of the cool things from the Apple Intelligence update, which started with iOS 18.1 last October, was notification summaries. These summaries aim to make your notifications easier to understand. But sometimes, they’ve had mistakes, which isn’t great, especially since this feature is still being tested.

    So, with iOS 18.3, Apple is making some changes:

    • They’re making AI summaries stand out by putting them in italics.
    • You can now stop summaries for specific apps straight from your notifications. Just swipe left, tap ‘Options,’ then ‘Turn Off Summaries.’
    • There’s now a reminder that this feature is still in beta, meaning it might not always get things right.

    Also, Apple has decided to turn off summaries for News & Entertainment apps for now. If you check your settings under Notifications ⇾ Summarize Notifications, you’ll see that for these apps, it says ‘Temporarily Unavailable.’

    The plan is to bring these summaries back once they’ve fixed the accuracy issues. This makes sense to me because news notifications are already summaries, and summarizing them again can lead to errors.

    Overall, Apple is doing the right thing by pausing, tweaking, and aiming for better accuracy before reintroducing this feature. This will hopefully lead to a smoother and more reliable experience for everyone using an iPhone.

    Source

  • Samsung unveils super-thin Galaxy S25 Edge to compete with iPhone 17 Air

    Samsung unveils super-thin Galaxy S25 Edge to compete with iPhone 17 Air

    At the Unpacked 2025 event, Samsung announced the new Galaxy S25, S25+, and S25 Ultra. But they saved a big surprise for last: they teased the Galaxy S25 Edge, a super thin phone.

    Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 17 Air

    Reporters from 9to5Google were at the event and saw the teaser for the Galaxy S25 Edge. We don’t know much yet – like when it will come out or what it can do. People guess it might be available in April or May. We only know for sure that it’s called the Galaxy S25 Edge.

    A recent report says the Galaxy S25 Edge might be about 6.4mm thick. On the other hand, Apple’s upcoming iPhone 17 Air is rumored to be even thinner, at around 5.5mm.

    Samsung began working on the S25 Edge right after hearing about the iPhone 17 Air rumors last May, according to one report.

    Leaked images from SmartPrix show the S25 Edge will have three cameras on the back. The iPhone 17 Air, however, is expected to have just one 48MP camera in a long, bar-shaped design.

    In a chat with Bloomberg, TM Roh, who leads Samsung’s phone business, talked about the new S25 Edge. He said, “We’re putting the best tech from our Ultra model into a much thinner phone. People want great performance, amazing cameras, and smart AI, but they also want a phone that looks cool and stands out.”

    Roh added, “We want to make this phone cheaper than our Ultra models so more people can buy it.”

    This sneak peek at the Galaxy S25 Edge has certainly got everyone talking about how Samsung and Apple are racing to make the slimmest, most feature-packed phones.

  • Navigating Shifting Sands: Apple’s manufacturing diversification faces new hurdles

    Navigating Shifting Sands: Apple’s manufacturing diversification faces new hurdles

    For years, whispers of Apple’s strategic shift away from its heavy reliance on Chinese manufacturing have circulated throughout the tech world. The company’s efforts to diversify its production footprint, particularly into burgeoning markets like India and Vietnam, have been well documented. This move, driven by a desire for greater supply chain resilience and geopolitical considerations, has now encountered a significant new obstacle: heightened export scrutiny from Chinese authorities. 

    Apple’s ambition to establish India as a major manufacturing hub has been particularly ambitious. Projections have suggested that a substantial portion of iPhone production could shift to India in the coming years. Recent milestones, such as the commencement of iPhone 16 production in India shortly after its global launch, signaled promising progress. This marked the first time a flagship iPhone model was manufactured in India so early in its product lifecycle, fueling speculation that Apple aimed for simultaneous production starts in both China and India for future models. 

    However, this carefully laid plan is now facing headwinds. A recent report suggests that Chinese customs officials are implementing stricter export checks on shipments of components and equipment destined for Apple’s overseas manufacturing facilities. These increased inspections, ostensibly related to a newly implemented law concerning “dual-use” technology – technology with both civilian and potential military applications – are causing significant delays, sometimes stretching to weeks.

    This development raises serious questions about the true motivations behind these stricter checks. While the official explanation focuses on national security concerns, many industry observers believe that economic and political factors are at play.

    From an economic perspective, China has a vested interest in retaining Apple’s manufacturing presence within its borders. The tech giant’s operations contribute significantly to the Chinese economy, providing employment and generating revenue. By creating obstacles for Apple’s diversification efforts, China may be attempting to discourage the company from shifting production capacity elsewhere.   

    The political dimension adds another layer of complexity. Geopolitical tensions and trade disputes have become increasingly prominent in recent years. Some analysts suggest that these heightened customs checks could be a form of leverage, a way for China to signal its potential for retaliatory action in the face of trade pressures. This perspective is further supported by reports that other US tech companies, such as Dell and Microsoft, are also accelerating their diversification efforts in response to similar pressures.

    The impact of these increased checks extends beyond just finished components. Reports indicate that even items not explicitly classified as “dual-use” are facing stricter scrutiny. This includes seemingly innocuous equipment like speed testing tools for smartphones. The broad interpretation of “potential military use” is creating uncertainty and delays across the supply chain.

    This situation highlights the delicate balance Apple must navigate. While the company is determined to reduce its reliance on a single manufacturing base, it also faces the reality of a complex global supply chain intertwined with geopolitical dynamics. The increased scrutiny from Chinese authorities presents a significant challenge to Apple’s diversification strategy, forcing the company to adapt and potentially reconsider its timelines and approaches. 

    The long-term implications of this development remain to be seen. It underscores the increasing importance of supply chain resilience and the need for companies to diversify their manufacturing and sourcing strategies. It also highlights the growing intersection of technology, economics, and international relations in the modern global landscape. As Apple continues its efforts to diversify its manufacturing footprint, it will need to carefully navigate these complex and evolving dynamics.

  • The Evolving Role of Apple Intelligence: From iPhone to Vision Pro

    The Evolving Role of Apple Intelligence: From iPhone to Vision Pro

    The buzz surrounding Apple Intelligence has been significant, but recent analysis suggests its immediate impact on iPhone sales and service revenue might be less dramatic than initially anticipated. While the long-term potential remains promising, the initial rollout and user adoption haven’t yet translated into a surge in device upgrades or a noticeable boost in service subscriptions. This raises questions about the current perception and future trajectory of Apple’s AI ambitions.

    One key factor contributing to this subdued initial impact is the staggered release of Apple Intelligence features. The delay between its initial announcement and the actual availability of key functionalities, even after the iPhone 16 launch, seems to have dampened user enthusiasm. This phased approach, with features like Writing Tools arriving in October, and Image Playground and Genmoji not until December, created a fragmented experience and may have diluted the initial excitement. Furthermore, comparisons to established cloud-based AI services like ChatGPT have highlighted the need for Apple Intelligence to demonstrate clear and compelling advantages to win over users.

    Concerns have also been raised regarding the monetization of Apple Intelligence. While Apple CEO Tim Cook has indicated no immediate plans to charge for these features, speculation persists about potential future subscription models. This uncertainty could be influencing user perception and adoption, as some may be hesitant to fully invest in features that might eventually come with a price tag.  

    However, it’s crucial to acknowledge the long-term perspective. While the initial impact on hardware sales and service revenue might be limited, Apple Intelligence holds considerable potential for future innovation and user experience enhancements. The ongoing development and integration of new features, particularly those related to Siri, suggest a commitment to evolving and refining Apple’s AI capabilities.

    The upcoming iOS 18.4 update, with its focus on Siri enhancements, represents a significant step in this direction. This update promises to bring substantial improvements to Siri’s functionality, including enhanced app actions, personal context awareness, and onscreen awareness. These advancements could transform Siri from a basic voice assistant into a truly intelligent and proactive digital companion.

    The implications of these Siri upgrades extend beyond the iPhone. The Vision Pro, Apple’s foray into spatial computing, stands to benefit significantly from these enhancements. In the immersive environment of Vision Pro, voice interaction becomes even more crucial, and a more intelligent and responsive Siri could significantly enhance the user experience.

    Early Vision Pro users have already discovered the importance of Siri for tasks like opening apps and dictating messages. The upcoming Siri upgrades in iOS 18.4, with their focus on contextual awareness and app integration, could unlock the true potential of spatial computing. Imagine seamlessly interacting with your digital environment simply by speaking, with Siri intelligently anticipating your needs and executing complex tasks. This vision of effortless interaction is what makes the future of Apple Intelligence, particularly within the context of Vision Pro, so compelling. 

    The journey of Apple Intelligence is still in its early stages. While the initial impact on iPhone upgrades and immediate revenue streams may not have met initial expectations, the ongoing development and integration of new features, particularly those focused on Siri, signal a long-term commitment to AI innovation.

    The Vision Pro, with its reliance on intuitive voice interaction, stands to be a major beneficiary of these advancements, potentially transforming the way we interact with technology in a spatial computing environment. The true potential of Apple Intelligence may lie not in driving immediate sales, but in shaping the future of human-computer interaction. 

    Source/Via

  • The Perils of AI-Generated News Summaries: Why Apple needs a smarter approach

    The Perils of AI-Generated News Summaries: Why Apple needs a smarter approach

    Artificial intelligence promises to simplify our lives, to sift through the noise and deliver concise, relevant information. However, recent developments with Apple Intelligence’s notification summaries have exposed a critical flaw: the potential for AI to inadvertently create and spread misinformation. This isn’t just a minor glitch; it’s a serious issue that demands a more thoughtful solution than simply tweaking the user interface. 

    Several high-profile incidents, notably highlighted by the BBC, have brought this problem to the forefront. These incidents include AI-generated summaries that falsely reported a person’s death, fabricated the outcome of sporting events, and misattributed personal information to athletes. These aren’t just minor errors; they are instances of AI effectively fabricating news, with potentially damaging consequences.  

    Apple’s proposed solution – a UI update to “further clarify when the text being displayed is summarization” – feels like a band-aid on a much deeper wound. While transparency is important, it doesn’t address the core problem: the AI is generating inaccurate information. Simply telling users that the information is a summary doesn’t make the information any more accurate.

    A more effective, albeit temporary, solution would be for Apple to disable AI-generated summaries for news applications by default. This approach acknowledges the unique nature of news consumption. Unlike a mis-summarized text message, which is easily corrected by reading the original message, news headlines often stand alone. People frequently scan headlines without reading the full article, making the accuracy of those headlines paramount. 

    Furthermore, news headlines are already summaries. Professional editors and journalists carefully craft headlines to encapsulate the essence of an article. For Apple Intelligence to then generate a “summary of the summary” is not only redundant but also introduces a significant risk of distortion and error. It’s akin to summarizing a haiku – the very act of summarizing destroys the carefully constructed meaning.  

    The BBC’s reporting highlighted that the problematic summaries often arose from the AI attempting to synthesize multiple news notifications into a single summary. While this feature is undoubtedly convenient, its potential for inaccuracy outweighs its benefits, especially when it comes to news. Temporarily sacrificing this aggregated view is a small price to pay for ensuring the accuracy of news alerts.

    Apple has thus far successfully navigated the potential pitfalls of AI-generated images, a feat that has eluded many of its competitors. However, the issue of AI news summaries presents a new challenge. While continuous improvements to the underlying AI models are undoubtedly underway, a more immediate and decisive action is needed. Implementing an opt-in system for news app summaries would provide a crucial safeguard against the spread of misinformation. It empowers users to choose whether they want the convenience of AI summaries, while protecting those who rely on headlines for quick information updates.

    This isn’t about stifling innovation; it’s about responsible implementation. Once the AI models have matured and proven their reliability, perhaps news app summaries can return as a default feature. But for now, prioritizing accuracy over convenience is the only responsible course of action.

    Apple Reaffirms Commitment to User Privacy Amidst Siri Lawsuit Settlement

    In a related development, Apple has publicly reaffirmed its commitment to user privacy, particularly concerning its voice assistant, Siri. This announcement comes on the heels of a $95 million settlement in a lawsuit alleging “unlawful and intentional recording” of Siri interactions.

    In a press release, Apple emphasized its dedication to protecting user data and reiterated that its products are designed with privacy as a core principle. The company explicitly stated that it has never used Siri data to build marketing profiles or shared such data with advertisers.  

    Apple detailed how Siri prioritizes on-device processing whenever possible. This means that many requests, such as reading unread messages or providing suggestions through widgets, are handled directly on the user’s device without needing to be sent to Apple’s servers.

    The company also clarified that audio recordings of user requests are not shared with Apple unless the user explicitly chooses to do so as feedback. When Siri does need to communicate with Apple’s servers, the requests are anonymized using a random identifier not linked to the user’s Apple Account. This process is designed to prevent tracking and identification of individual users. Audio recordings are deleted unless users choose to share them.  

    Apple extended these privacy practices to Apple Intelligence, emphasizing that most data processing occurs on-device. For tasks requiring larger models, Apple utilizes “Private Cloud Compute,” extending the privacy and security of the iPhone into the cloud.  

    The 2019 lawsuit that prompted the settlement alleged that Apple recorded Siri conversations without user consent and shared them with third-party services, potentially leading to targeted advertising. The suit centered on the “Hey Siri” feature, which requires the device to constantly listen for the activation command.  

    Despite maintaining its commitment to privacy and highlighting the numerous changes implemented over the years to enhance Siri’s privacy and security, Apple opted to settle the case. Details regarding how users can claim their share of the settlement are yet to be released. This situation underscores the ongoing tension between technological advancement and the imperative to protect user privacy in an increasingly data-driven world.

    Source/Via

  • Apple’s matching grants program marred by fraud allegations: A Deep Dive

    Apple’s matching grants program marred by fraud allegations: A Deep Dive

    In a troubling turn of events, Apple’s esteemed Matching Grants program, designed to amplify employee charitable giving, has been shaken by allegations of widespread fraud. This program, a cornerstone of Apple’s corporate social responsibility initiatives, allows employees to donate to eligible charities, with Apple matching those donations at a generous rate. However, recent investigations have uncovered a scheme that allegedly exploited this program for personal gain, leading to firings, criminal charges, and a closer examination of corporate oversight.  

    The Matching Grants program, launched with much fanfare by CEO Tim Cook in 2018, was intended to empower Apple employees to support causes they believe in. The program offered a 2:1 match, meaning for every dollar an employee donated, Apple would contribute two, up to an annual limit of $10,000 per employee. This generous policy aimed to significantly boost the impact of employee giving, turning individual contributions into substantial support for non-profit organizations.

    The recent allegations paint a starkly different picture. Reports indicate that approximately fifty Apple employees have been terminated following an internal investigation into potential fraud related to the Matching Grants program. Furthermore, six former employees in the Bay Area have been formally charged with criminal offenses, specifically tax fraud, connected to the alleged scheme. 

    The alleged fraud involved a complex system of falsified donations. It is claimed that certain employees collaborated with specific non-profit organizations, some reportedly connected to the Indian community, to manipulate the program. The scheme purportedly worked as follows: employees would make donations to these non-profits, triggering Apple’s matching contributions. However, instead of the funds remaining with the charities, they were allegedly funneled back to the employees, allowing them to effectively pocket Apple’s matching funds.  

    If these allegations are proven true, the implications are significant. Not only would this constitute a serious breach of Apple’s internal policies, but it would also violate US tax laws. By falsely claiming charitable donations, the employees could have illegally reduced their tax burden, amounting to tax fraud. The charges currently relate to approximately $152,000 over three years, suggesting a potentially widespread and sustained effort to exploit the program. 

    The ramifications extend beyond individual misconduct. Apple, in this scenario, would have inadvertently made charitable donations to organizations that were complicit in the scheme. Additionally, the state of California could have been defrauded through improper tax write-offs claimed by the employees for non-existent donations. This situation raises serious questions about the oversight mechanisms in place to prevent such fraud and the potential need for stricter controls in corporate giving programs. 

    Indonesia Stands Firm on Domestic Content Rules, Impacting iPhone 16 Sales

    In other news concerning Apple’s global operations, the company continues to face challenges in Indonesia regarding the sale of its iPhone 16 models. Despite a significant investment proposal, including the establishment of a local production facility, the Indonesian government has maintained its ban on iPhone 16 sales due to unmet domestic content requirements. 

    Indonesia has implemented a policy requiring smartphones sold within its borders to meet a certain threshold of locally sourced components. This policy aims to boost domestic manufacturing and create jobs within the country. Last year, Indonesian authorities determined that Apple’s iPhone 16 models did not meet the required 35% domestic content threshold, leading to a sales ban. 

    In response, Apple has offered a substantial $1 billion investment in Indonesia, which includes plans to build an AirTag production facility on Batam Island, near Singapore. This offer represents a significant increase from previous, smaller investment proposals that were rejected by the Indonesian government.  

    Despite this increased investment, the Indonesian government has remained firm on its stance. The Minister of Industry, Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita, has clarified that while the AirTag facility is a welcome investment, it does not directly contribute to the domestic content of iPhones. The government insists that only locally produced phone components will count towards meeting the domestic content requirement.  

    This situation highlights the complexities of navigating international trade and regulatory environments. While Apple is a major player in the global technology market, it must adhere to the specific regulations of each country in which it operates. Indonesia’s insistence on domestic content demonstrates its commitment to fostering local manufacturing and leveraging its large consumer market to attract foreign investment that benefits its economy. 

    The ongoing situation in Indonesia underscores the importance of local production and its impact on market access. This case serves as a reminder that large corporations must adapt to the specific requirements of individual countries and that investment alone does not guarantee market entry. The Indonesian government’s firm stance reflects a broader trend of countries seeking to maximize the economic benefits of foreign investment and promote domestic industries.

    Source/Via

More posts