RPRNA

Search results for: “X”

  • Apple updates CarPlay information, removes 2024 launch date

    Apple updates CarPlay information, removes 2024 launch date

    Apple has recently updated its website, removing the previously mentioned “2024” launch date for the next version of CarPlay. Just over three weeks into 2025, this change hints at a delay without specifying a new launch window.

    The next version of CarPlay was initially teased to come with cars in 2024, but as that didn’t happen, Apple has quietly adjusted its information. The website still talks about the upcoming CarPlay, suggesting it hasn’t been scrapped, but there’s no new timeline for when we might see it.

    It’s not clear who’s behind the delay – Apple, the car companies, or both. We’ve asked Apple for more details.

    Back in 2022, at WWDC, Apple gave us a first look at this advanced CarPlay. It would work closely with the car’s own systems, showing up on multiple screens like the dashboard and control panel. Features include an FM radio app, personalized widgets, and controls for the car’s climate directly from CarPlay, all tailored to match the brand and model of the vehicle.

    Even though the launch has been pushed back, there are signs it might still happen. New code in the latest iOS beta mentions CarPlay, and Apple has recently added new images to an EU database.

    Aston Martin and Porsche had shown off what their instrument clusters might look like with this new CarPlay, but they haven’t put it into use yet. Apple had promised support from a list of car makers including Acura, Audi, Ford, Honda, among others, though it’s uncertain if all are still on board.

    Apple’s recent statement reaffirms their commitment to the project:

    “The next CarPlay version is designed to blend Apple’s technology with each car maker’s unique style. We’re working with various car companies to make sure this happens, and they’ll share more when their new models are ready.”

    No new date was given for when we might see this updated CarPlay in action, keeping everyone guessing about its arrival.

  • Car makers still on board with Apple’s new CarPlay system

    Car makers still on board with Apple’s new CarPlay system

    Apple has recently announced that a number of car makers are still set to support the upcoming version of CarPlay in their upcoming car models. However, they didn’t specify when this would happen. Apple had earlier mentioned that this new CarPlay would be available in 2024, but that didn’t come to pass.

    Apple’s statement regarding the new CarPlay is:

    “The new CarPlay is designed based on our experience with the current system, offering an experience that combines the best of Apple’s technology with the car maker’s unique style. We are working closely with various car companies to help them display their brand’s unique look in the new CarPlay. Each car company will give more information as they get closer to announcing which cars will have this feature.”

    Apple also reaffirmed its dedication to the existing CarPlay system, noting that it’s now in more than 98% of new cars sold in the U.S. in recent times.

    Previously, Apple listed car makers like Acura, Audi, Ford, Honda, Infiniti, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Polestar, Porsche, Renault, and Volvo as partners for the new CarPlay. In late 2023, Aston Martin and Porsche showed off their versions of this new system, but they haven’t released it yet. It’s not clear which companies are currently working with Apple on this project.

    This update follows closely after Apple changed its website to take out the 2024 timeline for the new CarPlay they had mentioned before. The system was first shown off by Apple at their Worldwide Developers Conference in 2022.

  • Unlock two key benefits with your iPhone’s new thread radio

    Unlock two key benefits with your iPhone’s new thread radio

    Apple began introducing Thread radios into its devices towards the end of 2023, starting with the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. While Apple has been relatively quiet about this new feature, a recent interview sheds light on its benefits.

    Understanding the iPhone’s Thread Radio Advantages

    An insightful interview was published by The Verge, featuring three major contributors to Matter, the new standard for smart home devices. Among them was Vividh Siddha, who serves as both President of the Thread Group and Director at Apple.

    In the discussion, Siddha explained the purpose behind incorporating Thread radios into iPhones. He highlighted two main advantages:

    • Simplifying Smart Home Automation: For those new to smart homes, like someone buying a smart bulb or switch from a store, automating these devices can be tricky without additional equipment. The Thread radio in your iPhone allows for these automations directly, making life easier for early adopters.
    • Maintaining Access During Power Outages: If you lose power, and thus your Wi-Fi or other network systems are down, the Thread radio can still function. This means you can still use important smart devices like your front door lock, ensuring you can enter your home even in emergencies.

    Siddha’s dual roles give him a unique perspective on how Thread can revolutionize home automation, emphasizing these benefits are just the beginning.

    Thread Radios: A Step Forward for Apple’s Smart Home Vision

    The smart home landscape can be confusing, but with Matter, Apple aims to streamline this. Moreover, Apple’s recent push into smart home gadgets could change the game. In the coming months, expect new devices like the ‘HomePad’, followed by updates to the Apple TV 4K and a new HomePod mini. By 2026, Apple plans to launch smart doorbells and cameras.

    While the inclusion of Thread radios in the latest iPhones might not show immediate effects, over time, this technology is poised to enhance Apple’s smart home ecosystem significantly.

  • Trump criticizes EU over fines on Apple and other US tech companies

    Trump criticizes EU over fines on Apple and other US tech companies

    Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump has voiced strong disapproval of the European Union (EU) for imposing hefty fines on American tech giants like Apple, Google, and Facebook.

    US President Labels EU Actions as “Taxation”

    Speaking virtually at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump accused the EU of unfairly targeting major US companies. He described the fines as a “form of taxation” against American businesses, expressing frustration with the EU’s regulatory measures.

    Trump stated, “They’ve taken $15 or $16 billion from Apple, billions from Google, and now they’re after Facebook for even more. These are American companies, and what the EU is doing is wrong. In my view, it’s just another way of taxing them. We have serious complaints about the EU.”

    The Apple case Trump referred to centers around a lengthy legal dispute over taxes in Ireland. The EU ruled that Apple’s tax arrangement with Ireland violated its laws, forcing the tech giant to pay significant back taxes.

    Trump’s Broader Criticism of the EU

    Beyond tech companies, Trump criticized the EU’s broader economic policies, highlighting trade imbalances. He remarked, “The EU treats the US very unfairly. We’re dealing with hundreds of billions in trade deficits with them. No one is happy about it, and we’re going to take action.”

    Reactions and Implications

    Critics, however, were quick to point out Trump’s inconsistent stance. While he condemned the EU for regulating American firms, his own policies often focused on tariffs and trade measures against foreign businesses.

    These remarks signal potential challenges ahead for US tech companies operating in Europe. As the EU continues to scrutinize firms like Apple, Google, and Facebook, the friction between American leadership and European regulators could intensify.

    Trump’s statements also raise questions about how his administration might approach issues like App Store regulations and other matters affecting US tech firms in global markets.

  • Secure your new M4 Mac Mini with this $69 lock

    Secure your new M4 Mac Mini with this $69 lock

    Need to keep your brand new M4 Mac mini safe? Apple has introduced a new item in its online store just for that.

    Don’t worry, it’s not something scary like from a horror film. It’s actually a Kensington Security Mount made specifically for the M4 Mac mini. This accessory comes with two parts: a mounting bracket and a lock set that you can use by themselves or together.

    The Kensington Security Mount for Mac mini is perfect for securing your computer. You can use it to mount your Mac, lock it, or do both. It’s specially made to fit perfectly, giving you easy access to the power button and all the ports on your Mac mini.

    Made from strong steel, this mount can be attached to, under, or next to any firm surface. It also works with the NanoSaver™ lock that comes with it.

    With a five-year warranty, you can feel safe knowing Kensington, a top name in security solutions, has got you covered.

    Check out more pictures here:

    The Kensington Security Mount for Mac mini is priced at $69.95 and you can order it right now from Apple. They promise to deliver it as early as next week.

  • Apple TV+ misses out on Oscar nods for movies this year

    Apple TV+ misses out on Oscar nods for movies this year

    Apple TV+ has made big waves with its TV shows recently, but when it comes to movies, they’re still finding their footing. The latest Oscar nominations reveal that none of Apple’s films got any recognition this year.

    No Love from the Academy for Apple’s 2024 Films
    This year’s nominations for the 97th Academy Awards came out, and sadly, Apple didn’t get a single nomination in any category – not for directing, acting, or even for their documentaries or how the films look.

    Here’s a look at some Apple movies that could have been in the race if they had been shown in theaters:

    • “Blitz,” directed by Steve McQueen
    • “The Last of the Sea Women,” a much-talked-about documentary
    • “Fancy Dance,” which was Apple’s best-reviewed movie this year
    • “Fly Me to the Moon”
    • “Wolfs”

    This year’s Oscar snub really points out how Apple is still working on getting its movie game right, despite their success with TV series.

    From Oscar Glory to Current Challenges
    Back in 2022, Apple TV+ made history by being the first streaming service to win Best Picture with “CODA.” This was a big moment because even Netflix hadn’t achieved that before.

    However, since that win, Apple’s path in the movie world has seen some ups and downs. After a few films didn’t do well in theaters, and with “Wolfs” shifting to a streaming-only release at the last minute, Apple seems to be moving towards making movies just for streaming. They’re also focusing more on movies that appeal to a broader audience, like their big upcoming Formula 1 film, which might be their first big summer hit.

    Given this new direction, not getting Oscar nominations might not be as big of a blow to Apple as it once would have been. Still, it’s a bit of a letdown after their earlier Oscar triumphs.

  • Music Streaming Services: How much do they pay artists?

    Music Streaming Services: How much do they pay artists?

    Not all music streaming platforms give the same amount of money to musicians, and a recent study shows just how different these payments can be. For example, Apple Music pays artists way more than Spotify does.

    The study, done by Duetti, looks at how much artists got paid in 2024 by different platforms like Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube.

    One key thing they checked was how much money artists make for every 1,000 times their song is played. Here’s what they found for 2024:

    • Amazon paid $8.80 for 1,000 streams.
    • Apple Music paid $6.20.
    • YouTube paid $4.80.
    • Spotify only paid $3.00.

    This shows that Apple Music paid artists more than twice what Spotify did. One reason for Spotify’s lower payments is its free version which has lots of ads but doesn’t make much money for artists.

    While Spotify has ads like YouTube, YouTube still manages to pay artists more. Apple Music, on the other hand, only has paid subscriptions, which lets them give more money to artists.

    Another concerning point from the report is that even though Spotify has been increasing its prices, the money artists get from each stream has been going down. This is a bit troubling, especially since Spotify has been putting more effort into podcasts and audiobooks, possibly at the cost of music artists’ earnings.

  • Apple’s First Laser Printer: The birth of desktop publishing

    Apple’s First Laser Printer: The birth of desktop publishing

    Forty years ago today, Apple changed the world of printing with the launch of the LaserWriter. This was not just any printer; it was the start of what we now know as desktop publishing.

    The LaserWriter was Apple’s debut into the laser printing scene, and it was one of the earliest printers to use Adobe’s PostScript technology. This technology was special because it allowed for detailed and scalable printing of text, designs, and images, moving away from the less precise dot-matrix printers of that era.

    Under the hood, the LaserWriter was powered by a Motorola 68000 microprocessor, the same as in the Macintosh computers. It had its memory, could run its programs, and its processor was faster than those in the Macs, making it the most powerful piece of hardware Apple had at that time.

    With a print quality of 300 dots per inch (dpi), the LaserWriter could produce documents that looked like they came from high-end professional printers. When it first came out, it cost $6,995, which would be about $24,000 today.

    Alongside the LaserWriter, Apple introduced the AppleTalk networking system. This was groundbreaking because it enabled multiple computers to connect to one printer, making office printing more efficient than ever before.

    When combined with the Macintosh and programs like Aldus PageMaker, the LaserWriter allowed people to create and print professional-looking materials like flyers, newsletters, and ads right from their desks. This meant that publishing tools, once only available to big companies, were now within reach for smaller businesses, schools, and individual creators.

    Over time, Apple expanded the LaserWriter line, offering everything from high-end models like the LaserWriter Pro to more budget-friendly options like the Personal LaserWriter. However, as competitors like HP and Canon entered the market with cheaper yet similar technology, and as more printers worked well with Apple’s systems, the LaserWriter’s unique position weakened. By the time Steve Jobs came back to Apple in 1997, the decision was made to stop producing the LaserWriter, as focus shifted away from peripherals like printers.

  • iPhones with TikTok app sell for big bucks on eBay

    iPhones with TikTok app sell for big bucks on eBay

    People are selling old iPhones with TikTok already on them for lots of money on eBay. Some are even asking for up to $50,000! For example, someone listed an unlocked iPhone 12 Pro Max with TikTok for $50,000.

    Even though President Trump said companies wouldn’t get in trouble for not following the TikTok ban, big companies like Apple and Google are still not allowing TikTok in their app stores in the US.

    A Quick Update

    The US Supreme Court said yes to banning TikTok last Friday, and the ban started on January 19. TikTok was taken off the app stores on Sunday. Apple had to say they would follow the law. But then, Trump posted on social media that he would stop the ban when he became president again the next day, and he said companies could ignore the law without getting into trouble. So, TikTok came back online thanks to Bytedance, with Oracle, a US company, trusting Trump’s word.

    Trump then made an official statement saying the ban wouldn’t be enforced for 75 days, but lawyers said this might not be legal, meaning companies could still face huge fines of up to $850 billion. They also said Trump could change his mind if he didn’t like a company.

    eBay Listings for TikTok iPhones

    Wired noticed that some sellers on eBay are trying to make money by selling old phones with TikTok on them for much more than they are really worth.

    If you look up “TikTok phone” on eBay, you’ll find over 9,000 listings for phones from brands like Apple and Samsung, all with TikTok installed. Some listings are asking for $50,000, while many others are between $2,000 and $5,000.

    Luckily, it seems like most people aren’t paying these crazy prices. The phones with very high prices aren’t selling, and when they do sell, it’s often because buyers can offer a lower price through eBay’s “best offer” option.

    Here’s an interesting thing about these iPhones: if one user downloads apps using their Apple ID and then another user signs in with their own ID, the apps stay on the phone. But, if you ever reset your phone using your own iCloud backup, you’ll lose those apps.

    Source

  • Judge finds possible evidence that Apple paid women less than men

    Judge finds possible evidence that Apple paid women less than men

    A judge has decided that there’s a good chance Apple might have paid female employees less than their male counterparts, allowing a lawsuit from 12,000 current and former female workers to move forward.

    Apple’s Admission and Defense

    Apple has admitted there are differences in pay but insists these differences are due to individual circumstances, not deliberate discrimination.

    The Controversy Over Pay

    This issue was first highlighted in 2021 through an internal employee survey which revealed a 6% pay gap between men and women in technical positions. The survey showed men in middle-level tech roles earning about 6.25% more than women, and white employees earning 5.06% more than non-white employees in similar roles. The survey also pointed out that non-white workers received stock grants 11% later than white employees in entry and mid-level positions. Following this, Apple banned further internal pay surveys.

    The Lawsuit Against Apple

    Last year, a class action lawsuit was initiated under the California Equal Pay Act, claiming that Apple underpaid women. Apple tried to get the case thrown out, arguing the pay differences were fair based on individual factors. However, the judge disagreed, finding enough evidence to let the lawsuit proceed.

    Judge’s Ruling

    California Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman’s ruling denied Apple’s request to dismiss the allegations, agreeing that there was a “reasonable possibility” of widespread unequal pay in Apple’s engineering, AppleCare, and marketing departments.

    Three Points of Discrimination

    The lawsuit points out three main issues:

    • Salary History in Recruitment: Asking for past salaries or salary expectations during hiring could perpetuate existing pay gaps. Although Apple stopped asking for salary history, they still inquire about salary expectations, which might disadvantage women who tend to negotiate less aggressively.
    • Performance Reviews: There’s an accusation that performance evaluations might favor men over women, where similar behaviors are assessed differently based on gender.
    • Talent Reviews: These reviews allegedly lead to unequal pay for men and women of similar talent levels.

    Apple’s Response

    Apple has not commented on the recent judicial decision but has previously emphasized its commitment to pay equity, stating they do not base offers on salary history and regularly review compensation to ensure fairness.

    This case will continue as Apple prepares to defend its practices in court.

    Source

More posts