Search results for: “mate 30 pro”

Apple boosts US chip production and unveils new iPhone Fold design

Apple is stepping up its game with chip production in the United States. TSMC, the company that makes Apple’s chips, says its first US factory took longer than expected to start, but things are now speeding up. Future plants will be built much faster, taking just two years instead of five.

This means more Apple devices, like iPhones and Macs, will soon use chips made in America, starting with a 3nm plant in 2028 and a 2nm one by 2030. However, the latest, most advanced chips will still come from Taiwan, where TSMC keeps its top tech.

Meanwhile, Apple is working on something exciting—a foldable iPhone, nicknamed the “iPhone Fold.” It’s set to launch next year with a special hinge made of metallic glass. This material is super strong and won’t bend or dent easily, making the phone tougher and helping the screen stay smooth without creases.

The iPhone Fold will open to a 7.8-inch display and have a smaller 5.5-inch screen when closed, similar to some Samsung models. Priced around $2,000, it’ll be a premium gadget. Apple has used this metallic glass in small parts before, but this hinge will be its biggest use yet. With faster US chip-making and a cool new phone design, Apple fans have a lot to look forward to!

March 27, 2025
Rumors suggest iPhone 17 Pro models might switch back to aluminum frames

Apple has traditionally used a range of materials for the frames of its high-end iPhones, moving from aluminum to stainless steel, and most recently to titanium. Now, whispers in the tech world suggest that for the iPhone 17 series, Apple might revert to aluminum for most models.

According to Jeff Pu, an Apple supply chain analyst, who shared his insights in a note to GF Securities, three out of the four iPhone 17 models – the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max – will feature aluminum frames. Surprisingly, the rumored iPhone 17 Air is expected to keep the more durable titanium frame.

This switch back to aluminum for the Pro models is significant because the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro models were launched with titanium frames, making them lighter than their predecessors with stainless steel frames.

The motivation behind this potential change appears to be environmental. Aluminum has a smaller carbon footprint than titanium, aligning with Apple’s goal to make all its products and supply chain carbon-neutral by 2030. This move echoes Apple’s recent strategy with products like the new Mac mini and certain Apple Watches, potentially positioning some iPhone 17 models as the company’s first carbon-neutral smartphones.

The choice of titanium for the iPhone 17 Air, however, remains a bit of a mystery since aluminum is lighter, which would typically be preferred for a device aimed at being slim and lightweight. Last year, another analyst, Ming-Chi Kuo, hinted that the iPhone 17 Air might use a combination of both materials, with less titanium than used in the iPhone 15 Pro models. While the reasons for these material choices are not entirely clear yet, we can look forward to more details emerging as we approach the expected September reveal of the iPhone 17 series.

Source

February 19, 2025
The iPhone 17 Pro: A deep dive into the rumored camera revolution

The tech world is abuzz with whispers about the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, and the focus is squarely on the camera. Rumors paint a picture of a significant upgrade, with a potential shift in sensor size adding an intriguing twist. Let’s delve into the details and explore what these changes could mean for photography enthusiasts.

One of the most exciting rumors circulating is the possibility of three 48-megapixel cameras gracing the back of both the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max. This would be a first for Apple, creating a truly powerful and versatile camera system. Imagine the possibilities: a high-resolution main lens, an equally sharp ultrawide, and a dramatically improved telephoto lens, all working in concert to capture stunning images.

Sources suggest that the main camera will feature a 48MP “Fusion” lens, accompanied by a 48MP ultrawide lens. But the real game-changer is the rumored upgrade to the telephoto lens. Currently at 12MP on the iPhone 16 Pro models, the jump to 48MP promises a significant boost in zoom capabilities and image quality, bringing distant subjects into sharp focus. Both the primary and telephoto lenses are expected to be hybrid glass-plastic designs, potentially offering a balance of optical performance and manufacturing efficiency.

Furthermore, the front-facing camera is also rumored to be receiving a substantial upgrade, jumping from 12MP to 24MP. This change, corroborated by multiple sources, suggests a significant improvement in selfie quality and low-light performance. Imagine clearer video calls and more detailed self-portraits, even in challenging lighting conditions.

However, a somewhat surprising detail has emerged regarding the main camera sensor. While the resolution is set to remain at 48MP, rumors indicate a slight reduction in sensor size, from 1/1.28″ on the iPhone 16 Pro models to 1/1.3″ on the iPhone 17 Pro. While the difference might seem negligible on paper, it raises some interesting questions.

In the world of photography, sensor size plays a crucial role in image quality. A larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better performance in low-light situations and a shallower depth of field. So, why would Apple opt for a slightly smaller sensor?

Several theories have emerged. One possibility is related to the rumored redesign of the camera module. Reports suggest a shift towards a rectangular or elongated oval shape, potentially constructed from aluminum rather than glass. This new design could impose space constraints, necessitating a slightly smaller sensor.

Another possibility is that Apple is focusing on other areas of the camera system to compensate for the slight reduction in sensor size. Advancements in image processing, lens design, or other hardware components could offset any potential drawbacks, ensuring that the overall image quality remains exceptional. It’s also worth noting that the difference in size is minimal, and might not translate to a noticeable difference in everyday photography for most users.

The rumors also touch upon the overall design of the iPhone 17 Pro models. Whispers of a redesigned back, incorporating both aluminum and glass, along with the new camera module design, suggest a significant aesthetic shift. This new design language, combined with the camera upgrades, positions the iPhone 17 Pro as a potentially groundbreaking device.

The iPhone 17 lineup is expected to launch in September 2025, following Apple’s typical release cycle. While these are still just rumors, the consistency and detail of the information coming from various sources make them compelling. If these predictions hold true, the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max could represent a significant leap forward in mobile photography, offering users an even more powerful and versatile tool for capturing their world. It will be interesting to see how these rumors develop and what Apple ultimately unveils in the fall of 2025.

Source/Via

January 10, 2025
Apple supplier repurposes OLED production for iPhones amidst iPad Pro demand dip

The tech world is a dynamic landscape, constantly shifting and adapting to consumer demand. A recent development highlights this perfectly: a key Apple display supplier, LG Display, is making a significant adjustment to its production strategy. Faced with lower-than-anticipated sales of the OLED iPad Pro, the company is pivoting, repurposing a major production line to focus on manufacturing OLED panels for iPhones.

This decision comes after Apple introduced OLED technology to its larger-screened iPads earlier this year. The 11-inch and 13-inch iPad Pro models, launched in May, were the first to boast this vibrant display technology. Initially, projections were optimistic, with anticipated shipments reaching up to 10 million units in 2024.

However, market analysis painted a different picture. Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), a prominent market research firm, significantly revised its forecast in October, lowering the projection to a more modest 6.7 million units. This substantial downward revision signaled a need for strategic readjustment.

LG Display’s response is a pragmatic one. Rather than investing in an entirely new production line for iPhone OLED panels – a costly endeavor estimated at around 2 trillion won (approximately $1.5 billion) – the company is opting to adapt its existing facility. This line, originally built for 3.4 trillion won, is currently dedicated to producing OLED panels for tablets and PCs.

However, due to the sluggish demand for the OLED iPad Pro, the line has been operating at reduced capacity. By repurposing it for iPhone panel production, LG Display can effectively expand its iPhone OLED panel manufacturing capabilities with minimal additional investment. This strategic move allows for greater efficiency and resource optimization.

OLED technology offers several distinct advantages over traditional LCD displays. These include superior brightness, a significantly higher contrast ratio with deeper blacks, and improved power efficiency, which translates to longer battery life for devices. These enhancements contribute to a more immersive and visually appealing user experience.

While both iPad and iPhone OLED panels share the core benefits of OLED technology, there are some key technical differences in their construction. iPad displays utilize glass substrates with thin film encapsulation (TFE), a process that protects the delicate OLED materials from moisture and oxygen. In contrast, iPhone panels employ a polyimide substrate with TFE and feature a single emission layer, as opposed to the double emission layer used in iPad displays. This subtle difference is tailored to the specific requirements of each device.

Reports suggest that LG Display intends to maintain sufficient iPad OLED inventory through February while simultaneously seeking Apple’s approval for the production line modification. This careful planning ensures a smooth transition and minimizes any potential supply disruptions.

The company has set an ambitious goal to supply 70 million iPhone OLED panels in 2024, a significant increase from the mid-60 million units supplied last year and the 51.8 million units supplied in 2023. This target underscores LG Display’s commitment to meeting the growing demand for OLED displays in the iPhone market.

Looking ahead, the future of OLED technology in Apple’s product lineup remains a topic of considerable interest. Rumors suggest that Apple is exploring an OLED version of the iPad Air, potentially for release in 2026. However, given the current sales performance of the OLED iPad Pro models, the transition of the iPad Air from LCD to OLED could face delays of more than a year, according to DSCC.

Furthermore, there are expectations that Apple’s 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models could also make the switch from mini-LED to OLED displays as early as 2026, further solidifying the growing prominence of OLED technology across Apple’s product ecosystem. This shift by a major supplier like LG Display is a strong indicator of the evolving landscape of display technology and the strategic adjustments necessary to navigate the dynamic tech market.

January 6, 2025
iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Air to use top-notch screens

The upcoming iPhone 17 series from Apple will all feature Samsung’s high-quality “M14” OLED screen, says a tech insider on Weibo. Samsung’s “M” series screens are known for being in top smartphones, and the “14” means they use a lot of good materials to make them. This “M14” screen was first seen in last year’s iPhone 16 Pro models. It’s brighter by 30% and lasts longer because they made the blue light part work better.

Interestingly, Samsung’s newest Galaxy S25 Ultra uses a slightly older screen, the M13, which might mean that the regular iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Air might have better screens in some ways. Apple choosing the M14 screen for all its new phones makes sense because it wants to add ProMotion to all models. ProMotion means the screen can change how fast it refreshes, up to 120 times per second for smooth scrolling and videos. Before, only the “Pro” iPhones had this.

With ProMotion, the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Air screens can also slow down to just 1 refresh per second to save power, showing the time, notifications, and background even when the phone is off. Last year, the iPhone 16 Pro models got bigger screens, increasing from 6.12 inches to 6.27 inches for the Pro, and from 6.69 inches to 6.86 inches for the Pro Max.

In 2025, Apple plans to give the regular iPhone 17 a larger 6.27-inch screen too. The new iPhone 17 Air, which takes over from the Plus model, is expected to have a 6.6-inch screen, making it larger than the iPhone 17 but smaller than the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

Source

February 18, 2025
Samsung’s New Galaxy S25: Borrowing over a dozen iPhone traits, claims Macworld

Macworld argues that Samsung’s latest Galaxy S25 has taken inspiration from over a dozen iPhone features. From the phone’s sleek, straight-edged design to how its AI assistant displays, Samsung seems to have borrowed quite a bit from Apple.

Macworld’s Mahmoud Itani highlights this, starting with the AI features. The Galaxy S25 has integrated AI similar to Apple’s, allowing users to connect with third-party chatbots like Google Gemini, just as Apple does with ChatGPT in its system. When activating Gemini on the Galaxy S25, users see a text box with a colorful, glowing border, which looks a lot like Siri’s interface on iPhones. Additionally, the text selection tool in Samsung’s phone mimics Apple’s Writing Tools, offering options to proofread or transform text into tables.

Itani goes on to mention other features like the ability to record and summarize calls, perform natural language searches in the photo gallery, and a photo editing tool that resembles Apple’s Image Playground. There’s also a new feature similar to Apple’s Live Activities, called the Now Bar, and enhanced audio features for video recording akin to Apple’s cinematic audio.

9to5Mac’s Viewpoint
It’s clear that Samsung often looks to Apple for inspiration. Their strategy seems to involve quickly bringing to market features similar to those rumored or leaked for upcoming iPhones, aiming to beat Apple to the punch. However, Apple isn’t innocent of copying either, as both companies tend to adopt similar technologies once they’re mainstream.

Ultimately, this mutual borrowing is beneficial. The competitive pressure drives each company to innovate and perfect their offerings, leading to better products for consumers.

January 24, 2025
Apple’s First Laser Printer: The birth of desktop publishing

Forty years ago today, Apple changed the world of printing with the launch of the LaserWriter. This was not just any printer; it was the start of what we now know as desktop publishing.

The LaserWriter was Apple’s debut into the laser printing scene, and it was one of the earliest printers to use Adobe’s PostScript technology. This technology was special because it allowed for detailed and scalable printing of text, designs, and images, moving away from the less precise dot-matrix printers of that era.

Under the hood, the LaserWriter was powered by a Motorola 68000 microprocessor, the same as in the Macintosh computers. It had its memory, could run its programs, and its processor was faster than those in the Macs, making it the most powerful piece of hardware Apple had at that time.

With a print quality of 300 dots per inch (dpi), the LaserWriter could produce documents that looked like they came from high-end professional printers. When it first came out, it cost $6,995, which would be about $24,000 today.

Alongside the LaserWriter, Apple introduced the AppleTalk networking system. This was groundbreaking because it enabled multiple computers to connect to one printer, making office printing more efficient than ever before.

When combined with the Macintosh and programs like Aldus PageMaker, the LaserWriter allowed people to create and print professional-looking materials like flyers, newsletters, and ads right from their desks. This meant that publishing tools, once only available to big companies, were now within reach for smaller businesses, schools, and individual creators.

Over time, Apple expanded the LaserWriter line, offering everything from high-end models like the LaserWriter Pro to more budget-friendly options like the Personal LaserWriter. However, as competitors like HP and Canon entered the market with cheaper yet similar technology, and as more printers worked well with Apple’s systems, the LaserWriter’s unique position weakened. By the time Steve Jobs came back to Apple in 1997, the decision was made to stop producing the LaserWriter, as focus shifted away from peripherals like printers.

January 23, 2025
The TikTok Saga: Apple’s compliance and the shifting sands of digital sovereignty

The digital landscape shifted dramatically this past weekend as Apple, in a move echoing the complexities of international relations and technological control, removed TikTok and other ByteDance-owned applications from its U.S. App Store. This action, far from being a simple business decision, is a direct consequence of escalating legislative measures aimed at addressing perceived national security concerns surrounding foreign-owned digital platforms.

The backdrop to this removal is the recently enacted “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” a piece of legislation that mandates the divestiture of ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok within the United States. Failure to comply, the law stipulates, would result in a complete ban of the platform within the country. With the deadline for compliance having arrived, companies like Apple and Google were left with little choice but to enforce the law, facing substantial penalties for non-compliance.

Apple, in a publicly released statement, emphasized its commitment to adhering to the legal frameworks of the regions in which it operates. This statement underscores the delicate balance tech giants must maintain between global reach and local regulations. The removal of TikTok, along with other ByteDance applications such as CapCut and Hypic, was presented not as a matter of choice, but as a legal obligation.

The official statement from Apple clarifies the scope of the action: “Pursuant to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, apps developed by ByteDance Ltd. and its subsidiaries — including TikTok, CapCut, Lemon8, and others — will no longer be available for download or updates on the App Store for users in the United States starting January 19, 2025.” This statement serves as a clear confirmation of the legal impetus behind the removal.

The ramifications of this decision extend beyond mere app availability. Apple’s statement also addressed the implications for international visitors to the U.S. who may experience restricted functionality of ByteDance applications due to the newly implemented law. This detail highlights the far-reaching impact of the legislation, affecting not only U.S. citizens but also those traveling within the country.

For existing TikTok users in the United States, the impact was immediate. As of late Saturday, access to the app was effectively cut off, with TikTok itself acknowledging the “temporary unavailability” of the service within the U.S. While the app remains accessible and fully functional in other regions of the world, American users find themselves abruptly disconnected from the platform.

The timing of this event adds another layer of complexity to the situation. With the upcoming presidential inauguration scheduled for Monday, January 20th, rumors are circulating about a potential 90-day reprieve for TikTok.

Whether this reprieve will materialize remains to be seen, and the long-term future of TikTok’s operation within the U.S. under ByteDance ownership hangs in the balance. The possibility of requiring a change in ownership to comply with U.S. regulations is a significant point of discussion, adding uncertainty to the platform’s future in the American market.

This situation is more than just a dispute over a social media app. It represents a broader conversation about digital sovereignty, national security, and the influence of foreign technology within domestic markets. The actions taken by the U.S. government and the subsequent compliance by companies like Apple set a precedent that could have significant implications for the future of global digital interactions.

It raises important questions about the balance between national security concerns, free access to information, and the role of technology companies in navigating these complex issues. The TikTok saga is far from over, and its unfolding will undoubtedly continue to shape the discourse around technology, politics, and international relations.

January 19, 2025
Apple’s Latest Retail Design: A seamless blend of inside and out, plus Apple Card partnership shifts

Apple continues to refine its retail store aesthetic, with the latest opening in Hefei, China, showcasing the company’s commitment to a seamless transition between the exterior and interior. This design, characterized by a curved glass frontage, has now appeared in multiple locations, suggesting a new standard for Apple’s physical retail presence. Meanwhile, significant developments are unfolding in the financial realm, with reports indicating Apple is exploring new partnerships for its Apple Card program.

The new Apple MixC Hefei store, situated in a prominent business and financial district near Swan Lake, features a wide, curved glass facade. This design element, previously seen in stores in India and Shenzhen, China, creates a fluid connection between the outside world and the store’s interior. The absence of exterior pillars in the Hefei location further enhances this effect, making the transition even more subtle and inviting. Apple emphasizes the use of sustainably and locally sourced materials in the store’s construction, underscoring its commitment to environmental responsibility.

This curved glass design first emerged in 2023 at the Apple Saket store in India, a feature Apple highlighted as unique at the time. The store, with its white oak tables and a feature wall crafted in India, offered a welcoming environment for customers. The presence of CEO Tim Cook and retail head Deirdre O’Brien at the opening further emphasized the importance of this new design direction. However, the “unique” design quickly reappeared just a week later in Shenzhen, indicating a broader rollout of this architectural style.

The Hefei store’s opening coincides with the Lunar New Year, and Apple is marking the occasion with several special initiatives. Customers can purchase special-edition AirPods with custom Year of the Snake engravings. The store will also host workshops focused on using iPhone and Apple Vision Pro to capture and relive memories. Festive window decals and interior decorations will contribute to a celebratory atmosphere within the store. The store officially opened its doors on Saturday, January 18th.

In other news, Apple’s financial partnerships are undergoing significant changes. Following confirmation from Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon regarding the potential early termination of their partnership, reports have surfaced indicating Apple is in discussions with Barclays and Synchrony Financial to potentially take over the Apple Card program.

Goldman Sachs has faced challenges in its consumer credit division, incurring substantial losses. This has led the company to scale back parts of its consumer lending business, including personal loans offered through its Marcus brand. Goldman Sachs also recently ended its partnership with General Motors, transferring the GM credit card portfolio to Synchrony Financial.

The reports of Apple’s discussions with Barclays and Synchrony Financial come from sources familiar with the matter. Notably, Apple already has an existing relationship with Barclays for financing in the UK. Previous reports also suggested Apple was exploring partnerships with JP Morgan Chase and Capitol One.

The future of the Apple Card partnership remains uncertain, with no clear frontrunner identified at this time. Goldman Sachs currently serves as Apple’s partner for both the Apple Card and the associated Savings Account. While the existing agreement extends until 2030, Solomon’s comments suggest a potential early exit.

Regardless of which financial institution ultimately partners with Apple on the Apple Card, changes to the product are anticipated. The current Apple Card offers attractive interest-free financing options for Apple purchases and does not charge any fees. While these terms have been appealing to consumers, they have also contributed to Goldman Sachs’ financial losses. The new partnership will likely involve adjustments to these terms to ensure the program’s long-term sustainability. The future of Apple Card appears to be one of evolution and adaptation, reflecting the dynamic nature of the financial landscape.

January 16, 2025
The App Store Under Scrutiny: A multi-billion pound legal battle in the UK

The digital marketplace has revolutionized how we access software and services, but the rules governing these platforms are increasingly under the microscope. In a landmark case unfolding in London, Apple is facing a substantial legal challenge concerning its App Store practices, a case that could have significant ramifications for the future of digital commerce.

At the heart of the matter is a £1.5 billion lawsuit alleging anti-competitive behavior. The lawsuit, brought forth by Dr. Rachael Kent, a respected academic from King’s College London, argues that Apple’s control over app distribution on its iOS devices, coupled with its commission structure, constitutes a breach of UK and European competition law. This isn’t just a minor dispute; it’s a David versus Goliath battle that questions the fundamental power dynamics within the app ecosystem.

The core of the complaint lies in Apple’s requirement that all iOS apps be downloaded exclusively through the App Store. This exclusivity, combined with a commission of up to 30% levied on developers for in-app purchases and app sales, is seen by the plaintiffs as an unfair imposition that stifles competition and ultimately harms consumers. They argue that this “walled garden” approach limits choice and potentially inflates prices.

This legal action isn’t just a theoretical debate; it directly impacts millions of consumers. The lawsuit represents an estimated 19.6 million UK iPhone and iPad users who may have been overcharged for apps and in-app purchases over a significant period, from October 2015 to November 2024. The scale of this case is immense, with a vast number of individuals automatically included in the claim unless they actively choose to opt out. This reflects the UK’s legal framework, which aims to provide efficient redress for widespread consumer harm.

Dr. Kent’s argument is compelling: while the App Store initially served as a valuable and innovative platform, streamlining access to digital services, it has evolved into a monopolistic gatekeeper. She contends that Apple has effectively blocked access to alternative app distribution platforms, preventing consumers from potentially benefiting from more competitive pricing and developers from exploring alternative business models. This lack of competition, the lawsuit claims, is detrimental to the overall health of the digital marketplace.

Apple, however, vehemently denies these allegations. They have characterized the lawsuit as “meritless” and maintain that their App Store commission rates are in line with industry standards for digital marketplaces. They point to the fact that a significant majority—around 85%—of apps on the App Store are offered free of charge. Furthermore, they emphasize that many developers qualify for a reduced 15% commission rate, particularly smaller businesses and individual developers. This, they argue, demonstrates a commitment to supporting a diverse and thriving app ecosystem.

The trial, taking place at the Competition Appeal Tribunal, is expected to be a lengthy and complex affair, spanning approximately seven weeks. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how digital marketplaces are regulated, not just in the UK, but potentially globally. This isn’t an isolated incident; Apple is facing similar legal challenges in other jurisdictions around the world, all centering on its App Store practices.

Adding further weight to the situation, Apple is also currently involved in a separate £785 million UK lawsuit related to developer fees. Moreover, the European Commission recently imposed a €500 million fine on Apple for breaching digital competition rules related to music streaming services. These concurrent legal battles paint a picture of a company facing increasing scrutiny over its market dominance and business practices.

This case is more than just a legal dispute between a tech giant and a group of consumers; it’s a reflection of a broader debate about the balance of power in the digital age. It raises fundamental questions about competition, consumer rights, and the role of regulation in ensuring a fair and dynamic digital marketplace. The outcome of this trial will be closely watched by businesses, consumers, and regulators alike, as it could have a profound impact on the future of the app economy.

January 13, 2025

More posts